Journal of Occupational Health
Online ISSN : 1348-9585
Print ISSN : 1341-9145
ISSN-L : 1341-9145
Originals
Cupping for Treating Neck Pain in Video Display Terminal (VDT) Users: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
Tae-Hun KimJung Won KangKun Hyung KimMin Hee LeeJung Eun KimJoo-Hee KimSeunghoon LeeMi-Suk ShinSo-Young JungAe-Ran KimHyo-Ju ParkKwon Eui Hong
Author information
JOURNALS FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2012 Volume 54 Issue 6 Pages 416-426

Details
Abstract

Objectives: This was a randomized controlled pilot trial to evaluate the effectiveness of cupping therapy for neck pain in video display terminal (VDT) workers. Methods: Forty VDT workers with moderate to severe neck pain were recruited from May, 2011 to February, 2012. Participants were randomly allocated into one of the two interventions: 6 sessions of wet and dry cupping or heating pad application. The participants were offered an exercise program to perform during the participation period. A 0 to 100 numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck pain, measure yourself medical outcome profile 2 score (MYMOP2 score), cervical spine range of motion (C-spine ROM), neck disability index (NDI), the EuroQol health index (EQ-5D), short form stress response inventory (SRI-SF) and fatigue severity scale (FSS) were assessed at several points during a 7-week period. Results: Compared with a heating pad, cupping was more effective in improving pain (adjusted NRS difference: −1.29 [95% CI −1.61, −0.97] at 3 weeks (p=0.025) and −1.16 [−1.48, −0.84] at 7 weeks (p=0.005)), neck function (adjusted NDI difference: −0.79 [−1.11, −0.47] at 3 (p=0.0039) and 7 weeks (p<0.0001)) and discomfort (adjusted MYMOP2 difference score: −0.72 [−1.04 to −0.40] at 3 weeks and −0.92 [−1.24, −0.60] at 7 weeks). Significant improvement in EQ-5D was observed at 7 weeks (1.0 [0.88, 1.0] with cupping and 0.91 [0.86, 0.91] with heating pad treatment, p=0.0054). Four participants reported mild adverse events of cupping. Conclusion: Two weeks of cupping therapy and an exercise program may be effective in reducing pain and improving neck function in VDT workers.

Introduction

Work involving video display terminals (VDTs) is very common in modern society. VDT work has accompanied the sharp increase in the use of personal computers for work in the last several decades. According to a national survey of the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japanese laborers who engaged in VDT-related work comprised only 15.3% of all the working population in 1998, but after 10 years, that fraction increased to 79.2%1). German census data from 2004 suggested that twenty-one million people, comprising 59% of all hired workers, were engaged in computer-related work during daily life2).

Along with the rapid changes of working environments into VDT stations, various symptoms related to VDT use have been increasingly reported. Sixty-three per cent of office workers have been suggested to have musculoskeletal symptoms, and 42% of them might suffer head and neck pain3). Thirty-six per cent of VDT workers have the symptoms of dry eye syndrome or were diagnosed with the problem4). In addition, eye symptoms such as asthenopia, pain and fatigue are suffered by many workers1,5). Recent systematic reviews (SRs) suggest that there is evidence that tension neck syndromes of VDT workers are strongly related to the use of computers6). To prevent or treat these symptoms in VDT workers, the workstation guidelines for such tools as monitor displays, keyboards, tables, chairs and even working posture are currently available in Korea7).

Cupping is an intervention that has been widely used in Asia, the Middle East8) and European countries9) as an alternative therapy. In Korea, most doctors who practice Korean medicine (about 90%) are currently using cupping therapy in clinical practice10,11). In Korean medicine (KM), cupping has been employed for facilitating the circulation of qi and blood and removing blood stasis using cupping therapy devices through suction and negative pressure12). According to a recent survey of Korean medicinal doctors, cupping is primarily used for the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases (96%), and the most frequently used points for cupping are the neck and shoulder (94%)13). Considering that a recent SR suggested that acupuncture, another traditional intervention that stimulates acupuncture points similar to cupping therapy, may possess short-term efficacy and effectiveness for the treatment of neck pain14), clinical evidence concerning the effectiveness of cupping for neck pain also needs to be evaluated through rigorous clinical trials. For this purpose, we evaluated the feasibility of a large sample size clinical study and conducted a basic statistical analysis to evaluate the potential effectiveness and safety of cupping for neck pain through this randomized controlled pilot trial.

Methods

This was a randomized controlled pilot trial. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of cupping and heating pad therapies on neck pain, functional disability and quality of life in VDT workers and to evaluate the feasibility of this intervention for a large, randomized controlled trial as well.

Forty VDT workers with neck pain were recruited at the Oriental Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Daejeon City, South Korea, through advertisement in local newspapers and web pages of local companies and universities from May, 2011 to February, 2012. VDT users who worked with computers at least 20 hours a week and suffered work-related neck pain continuously for at least 3 months with an average severity over 40 on a 100 numeric rating scale (NRS) were included in the study. Participants who had serious conditions of the spine and spinal cord (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis), infectious disease, spinal fracture, myelopathy, acute herniation of the cervical intervertebral disk within 3 months, malignancy, immune disorders or whiplash injuries within the previous year were excluded. Cupping therapy involves an invasive procedure, so participants who had blood-borne diseases or hemostatic abnormalities, such as AIDS, active hepatitis, syphilis, hemophilia and anemia, or took anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents, such as warfarin, dipyridamole aspirin and ticlopidine, were excluded. Random sequences for group allocation of the participants were generated with a computer software package (SAS® Version 9.1.3, SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Random number tables and randomization block sizes were controlled by an independent statistical expert. Group allocation results were concealed by opaque, sealed envelopes with serial numbers, and the participants were assigned at the second visit by opening envelops in a sequential manner after their eligibility was assessed at the first visit. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The institutional review board of the Oriental Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University approved the study protocol (board approval number: djomc-59-1), and the study protocol was registered before the start of this trial at the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), which is the only primary registry in South Korea (registration number: KCT0000106).

Interventions

Participants in both the cupping and heating pad groups attended the assigned treatments 3 times per week during a total of 2 weeks, and the symptoms related to VDT work were evaluated for 7 weeks. For the cupping therapy, various sizes of sterile disposable cups (Seongho Trade & Company, Korea) from 1.5 cm to 5 cm in diameter were used. Six to ten tender points of the posterior neck, upper trapezius and perispinal area of the neck and thoracic spine, such as GV14, GV16, GV15, GV12, GB20, GB21, LI17, SI11, SI12, SI13, SI14, SI15, BL10, BL11, BL12, BL13, BL14, Bl15, BL16, BL17, BL41, BL42, BL43, BL44 and EX-HN15, were selected for treatment. Dry cupping without puncture of the skin was applied mainly, but wet cupping was also applied for up to 2 points in the case of lesions with blood-stasis symptoms, severe tenderness and prominent warmness. According to the predefined clean technique procedure15), cupping cups were attached after 3 to 5 cycles of pumping for negative pressure by cupping pump and retained for 5 to 10 minutes according to the patient's general condition and symptom severity. For wet cupping, the skin was punctured 6 times to a 2-mm depth around the cupping sites with 26-gauge disposable lancets (Tianjin Haing Lim Sou Won Medical Instrument Co., China). At the sites where wet cupping was applied, 3 to 5 cc of blood was drained. The selection of points and cupping methods were decided by practitioners after a brief consultation with the participants at each treatment session and was based on the basic guidelines of treatment from acupuncture textbooks and previous studies16,17). Cupping treatment was conducted by qualified KM doctors who had over 4 years of practical clinical experience that had been acquired after finishing approximately 10 years of education and training (Appendix).

The participants assigned to the control group had heating pads warmed by hot water applied to the neck and upper trapezius for 10 minutes, 3 times per week for 2 weeks. Heating pad therapy is one of the most popular treatment tools for neck pain. It is used alone or concomitant with other physiotherapies for neck pain18). The surface temperature of the heating pad was maintained at 55 degrees centigrade, and it was applied by independent physical therapists. A brochure explaining the relationship between VDT work and diseases, common treatments for patients with evidence of neck pain, advice on the life style modification when performing VDT work and exercise program details were offered to both treatment groups. During the 7-week participation period, neck and shoulder stretching exercises were performed in the office, and two types of deep cervical flexion exercises (i.e., craniocervical flexion and cervical flexion) were encouraged for home use19,20). Except for this self-exercise program, all other neck pain treatments, such as acupuncture, yoga, Pilates, manipulation therapy, drug therapy, injection therapy and physical therapy were not allowed.

Outcome assessments

All the outcome assessment tools were developed in or translated into Korean and validated properly through previous validation studies. The primary outcome of this study was one-week average neck pain as measured by NRS (range 0 to 100) after the end of the 4-week treatment course. For evaluating the general improvement of pain, the average NRS of the last 7 days was assessed at every visit. In addition, a diary with the time series NRS data was collected from every participant at every treatment visit. The NRS scores before and after treatment in addition to after 1, 4, 8 and 12 hours after treatment were assessed to test the short-term change of pain in both groups.

The secondary outcome variables were the measure yourself medical outcome profile 2 score (MYMOP2 score), cervical spine range of motion (C-spine ROM), neck disability index (NDI), EQ-5D, short form of stress response inventory (SRI-SF) and fatigue severity scale (FSS). MYMOP2 is a patient-generated instrument that is being used increasingly in primary care, particularly for assessing the effectiveness of complementary therapies21). MYMOP2 is composed of 3 items: the first item is symptoms 1 and 2, which are the greatest and second-most physiological or psychological symptoms causing discomfort on a scale of 0 (the best) to 6 (the worst). The second item records how daily living activities are affected by symptoms 1 and 2 on a scale of 0 (the best) to 6 (the worst). The third item is a well-being score, recording on a scale from 0 (the best) to 6 (the worst). The MYMOP2 score is calculated by summing the symptom 1, symptom 2, activity and well-being scores and then dividing by the number of checked items. The score ranges from 0 (the best) to 6 (the worst). C-spine ROM was evaluated before and after treatment and at the 4-week follow-up with CROM (cervical range of motion instrument, Performance Attainment Associates, Lindstrom, MN, USA). Cervical flexion, extension, left and right flexion and left and right rotation were assessed in an erect sitting posture in a straight-back chair. NDI is an inventory used to evaluate the function and disability of the neck. The instrument consists of 10 sections including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation22). All subsections are rated with a score from 0 (the best) to 5 (the worst), and the NDI score is presented as a percentage score, which is the total score*100/total possible score. The possible NDI scores range from 0% (the best) to 100% (the worst). The EuroQol health index (EQ-5D) is one of the most commonly used tools for evaluating current status of quality of life. The five dimensions of EQ-5D are mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. In this study, we adopted the EQ-5D-3L in which each domain has 3 levels, ranging from no problems to extreme problems. If each level is recorded as a number between 1 to 3, and then each patient has a 5-digit number that ranges from 11,111 (the perfect health status) to 33,333 (the worst health status). The EQ-5D index of each patient was determined by using a transformed value from a 2007 study titled EQ-5D Korean Valuation Study Using Time Trade Off Method23). The EQ-5D index values range from 1 for 11,111 to −0.171 for 33,333. The SRI-SF is a tool for evaluating stress response during the preceding 7 days. It has 3 dimensions and a total of 22 questions with scores ranging from 1 (the best) to 5 (the worst). The SRI-SF score is the sum of the scores for all 22 questions, and it ranges from 22 (the best) to 110 (the worst)24). FSS is an inventory used to evaluate fatigue during the preceding 7 days. It has 9 items scored from 1 (the best) to 7 (the worst) individually. The FSS score is the sum of 9 item scores divided by 9. It ranges from 1 (the best) to 7 (the worst)25). Adverse events (AEs), which were checked for by practitioners at every visit, were reported as AE type and frequency according to the criteria of the World Health Organisation (WHO Toxicity Grading Scale for Determining The Severity of Adverse Events)26).

Statistical analysis and expectation assessment for cupping therapy

This was a pilot trial, so sample size was not calculated at the beginning. Considering the feasibility for conducting a trial and the appropriate precision of this study result, we assigned a minimum of 20 participants to each group27). Basically, an intention-to-treat analysis was conducted for statistical analysis, and missing data were amended with the last observation carried forward method. After applying a Shapiro-Wilk test for evaluating the normality of the data, a Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was applied to categorical data, and a two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was applied to continuous data for the statistical analysis of baseline characteristics between the two groups. The primary and secondary outcomes after treatment and at the 4-week follow-up were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The baseline scores were used as covariates. The effect size for each outcome was calculated as eta-squared, and Cohen's criteria were used to interpret each effect28). The time series data obtained from the NRS diaries were tested by repeated measures ANOVA for trend analysis. All statistical analyses were conducted using a computer software package (SAS® Version 9.1.3, SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The expectation on the effectiveness of cupping was assessed in both of the groups before participation group allocation.

Results

In total, 49 participants were assessed for eligibility, and 40 participants were included in the study (Fig. 1). One participant was lost to follow-up from the cupping group, and one participant dropped out from the heating pad group because he did not want the heating pad treatment. The participants were mostly young adults and had about 2 years of neck pain history on average. Most of the participants used computers and/or watched TV over 30 hours per week. Along with neck pain, various VDT-related symptoms were observed in both groups. Asthenopia, back pain, shoulder and arm pain, fatigue and stressfulness were reported from over half of the participants (Table 1). During the work environment evaluation, most participants complained of problems with their workstation, such as uncomfortable chairs and keyboards or problems with sitting and typing postures (e.g., inappropriate angle of the wrist, knee and lumbar, Table 2). There were no significant differences between the two groups for all the baseline characteristics and expectations of the effectiveness of the cupping treatment (Tables 1 and 2).

Fig. 1.

CONSORT flow chart.

Table 1. Demographic data in the cupping and heating pad groups
Characteristics Cupping group (n=20) Heating pad group (n=20) p-value
Age, years (median [25% to 75% IQR])* 25.5 [22.5 to 40.5] 28 [25 to 41.5] 0.46
Sex M/F, No. 7/13 11/9 0.20
Duration of illness, years (median [25% to 75% IQR])* 2.5 [1.85 to 4] 2 [1.25 to 3.75] 0.50
Average time of computer or TV usage, h/wk (median [25% to 75% IQR])* 32.5 [28 to 41] 31.25 [24 to 39.25] 0.39
Exercise (yes/no) 7/12 8/12 0.84
Past experience of drug therapy for neck pain (yes/no) 1/19 2/18 1.0
Past experience of injection therapy for neck pain (yes/no) 2/18 2/18 1.0
Past experience of physical therapy for neck pain (yes/no) 8/12 10/10 0.53
Past experience of cupping therapy for any reason (yes/no) 11/9 15/5 0.18
Concomitant symptoms related to VDT work
   (1) Eye pain, No. 4/16 6/14 0.47
   (2) Dry eye, No. 8/12 12/8 0.21
   (3) Asthenopia, No. 17/3 16/4 0.68
   (4) Problems of visual acuity, No. 5/15 10/10 0.10
   (5) Other ophthalmological problems, No. 2/18 2/18 1.0
   (6) Headache, No. 5/15 8/12 0.31
   (7) Back pain, No. 11/9 12/8 0.75
   (8) Shoulder and arm pain, No. 14/6 17/3 0.45
   (9) Elbow pain, No. 2/18 4/16 0.66
   (10) Wrist pain, No. 8/12 8/12 1.0
   (11) Finger pain, No. 4/16 2/18 0.66
   (12) Low back pain, No. 8/12 9/11 0.75
   (13) Other musculoskeletal pain, No. 0/20 0/20 0
   (14) Depressive mood, No. 2/18 4/16 0.66
   (15) Fatigue, No. 13/7 15/5 0.49
   (16) Stressfulness, No. 10/10 10/10 1.0
   (17) Other psychological symptoms, No. 1/19 0/20 1.0
   (18) Skin problems, No. 4/16 5/15 1.0
   (19) Dyspepsia, No. 3/17 2/18 1.0
   (20) Other symptoms, No. 0/20 1/19 1.0
Assessment of expectation on the effectiveness of cupping (median [25% to 75% IQR])* 7 [5.5, 7] 7 [6, 8] 0.38
*  The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical analysis.

†  The Chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis.

‡  The Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. IQR: interquartile range.

Table 2. Evaluation of the workstation in the cupping and heating pad groups
Workstation evaluation [50] Cupping group (n=21) Heating pad group (n=20) p-value
(1) Keyboard is ergonomic? (yes/no)* 1/19 0/20 1.0
(2) The mouse is held in a neutral position of the wrist? (yes/no)* 15/5 17/3 0.69
(3) Top of computer screen is at the eye level? (yes/no) 9/11 15/5 0.05
(4) Chair height is appropriate? (yes/no)* 16/4 17/3 1.0
(5) There is enough space between the chair and calves? (yes/no)* 17/3 17/3 1.0
(6) There are arm supports on the chair? (yes/no) 13/7 16/4 0.29
(7) The back of the chair is supportive? (yes/no) 16/4 16/4 1.0
(8) The back of the chair is adjustable? (yes/no) 6/14 5/15 0.72
(9) There is a lumbar support? (yes/no)* 4/16 4/16 1.0
(10) Elbow angles are 70–90 degrees? (yes/no)* 17/3 16/4 1.0
(11) Elbows are supported when using a keyboard? (yes/no) 8/12 10/10 0.53
(12) Elbows are supported when using a mouse? (yes/no) 13/7 13/7 1.0
(13) Wrist angle is within 10 degrees of neutral when using a keyboard? (yes/no)* 4/16 5/15 1.0
(14) The feet touch on the floor? (yes/no)* 19/1 20/0 1.0
(15) The angle of the knees is 70 to 90 degrees and buttock's angle is 90 degree? (yes/no) 5/15 8/12 0.31
(16) There is a copy holder on the monitor? (yes/no)* 2/18 5/15 0.41
(17) The neck is in a neutral position when looking at the monitor? (yes/no) 13/7 14/6 0.74
*  The Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis.

†  The Chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis.

NRS

One-week average neck pain was significantly improved in favor of cupping therapy after treatment and 4 weeks after the end of the whole treatment course. The eta-squared values were 0.1642 at 3 weeks and 0.1262 at 7 weeks. These observed values indicate a comparatively large effect of cupping on neck pain after 2 weeks of treatment and at the 4-week follow-up (Table 3).

Table 3. Primary and secondary outcomes at each visit
Cupping group (n=20, mean, SD) Heating pad group (n=20, mean, SD) p-value Effect size (η2)
Baseline 3 weeks 7 weeks Baseline 3 weeks 7 weeks 3 weeks 7 weeks 3 weeks 7 weeks
NRS (mean, SD) 59.25, 16.33 28.55, 17.83 28.75, 21.87 64.85, 14.89 48.3, 18.16 50.3, 21.26 0.025* 0.005* 0.1642 0.1262
MYMOP2 (mean, SD) 3.43, 0.88 2.27, 1.08 2.03, 0.96 3.56, 0.83 3.09, 0.86 3.03, 1.15 0.0127* 0.0035* 0.1425 0.1601
NDI score, % point (mean, SD) 23.33, 10.41 11.57, 8.17 10.19, 5.99 22.96, 8.61 19.26, 10.95 20.63, 9.82 0.0039* <0.0001* 0.1509 0.3136
EQ-5D index (median [25% to 75% IQR]) 0.91 [0.87, 0.91] 0.91 [0.91, 1.0] 1.0 [0.88, 1.0] 0.89 [0.86, 0.91] 0.91 [0.86, 0.91] 0.91 [0.86, 0.91] 0.1072 0.0054* 0.0427 0.1537
SRI-SF 36.5, 15.87 32, 10.08 33.35, 11.95 40.1, 12.68 35.8, 9.51 37.85, 8.95 0.3643 0.2921 0.0114 0.0180
FSS 3.10, 1.29 2.61, 1.23 2.33, 1.09 3.31, 1.41 3.04, 1.16 3.02, 1.35 0.1980 0.0511 0.0140 0.0480

ANCOVA was used for the statistical analysis of changes from baseline between the two groups with regard to each outcome at the primary and secondary end points (covariate: baseline value).

*  p<0.05.

NRS: numeric rating scale, MYMOP2: Measure yourself medical outcome profile 2, NDI: neck disability index, IQR: interquartile range, SRI-SF: short form of stress response inventory, FSS: fatigue severity scale.

Time series data from the NRS diaries suggest that cupping decreased neck pain immediately after the treatment, and this analgesic effect was maintained for at least 12 hours when compared with the heating pad treatment (Fig. 2). The repeated measures ANOVA results suggested that trends in the variation of pain severity in both groups moved in a similar pattern during the first 4 hours after treatment, but they were changed after 8 hours (p=0.010 at 8 hours and p=0.009 at 12 hours). These results indicated that the NRS for neck pain in the cupping group continued to decrease after 8 hours but did not for the heating pad group.

Fig. 2.

The time series numeric rating scale data on neck pain before and after treatment.

MYMOP2

Symptom 1 of MYMOP2 before treatment was neck pain alone (21 participants), shoulder pain alone (9), neck and shoulder pain (5), low-back pain (2), dizziness (1), fatigue (1) and stress (1). About half of the participants did not have a symptom 2 (18 participants), but neck pain (9), shoulder pain (5), headache (2), low-back pain (1), fatigue (1), elbow pain (1), upper-back pain (2) and wrist pain (1) were reported as symptom 2 in the other participants. The mean MYMOP2 score significantly decreased in the cupping group compared with the heating pad group. The eta-squared values suggested that cupping had a large effect in improving symptoms related to VDT work at 3 weeks (0.1425) and at 7 weeks (0.1601, Table 3).

NDI and ROM of C-spine

The mean NDI score also decreased in the cupping group at 3 and 7 weeks, respectively, compared with the heating pad group. The effect sizes were very large at 3 weeks (0.1509) and 7 weeks (0.3136, Table 3). The analysis of individual section scores using ANCOVA suggested that cupping treatment showed significant improvement in reading (p=0.039), headaches (p=0.001), work (p=0.002) and sleeping (p=0.033) after 2 weeks of treatment when compared with heating pad application. In addition, significant differences were observed in all the sections except reading at 7 weeks. Among the cervical ROM changes, significant improvement was observed only in neck extension at 7 weeks (ANCOVA, p=0.0491, Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

The change in cervical spine range of motion.

EQ-5D index

The median EQ-5D index did not show a significant difference between the 2 groups at 3 weeks (0.91 [0.91, 1.0] in the cupping group and heating pad group), but a significant difference in favor of cupping treatment was observed at 7 weeks. Effect sizes showed the same pattern; a small to medium effect was reported at 3 weeks (0.0427) but a large effect was observed at 7 weeks (0.1537, Table 3).

Adverse events

Four participants complained of adverse events related to the cupping therapy: skin laceration, whole body itching, pain at the cupping sites and generalized body ache. Except for the whole body itching, the other 3 symptoms were assumed to be caused by the cupping therapy. All of the symptoms were mild and disappeared within several days.

Discussion

Originally, this was a preliminary study with a minimal sample size to lay the groundwork for a future trial in which we would evaluate the effect of cupping therapy for neck pain in VDT users. However, when we evaluated the ideal sample size for testing the primary outcome difference (NRS) between the cupping and heating pad groups, we found that for a result with a 0.05 for α, 0.2 for β and a 10% for drop-out rate, only 15 participants for each group were required. Cupping was considerably effective in improving pain and function of the neck and relieving bothersome symptoms of VDT users in this study. Quality of life also largely improved after treatment. The body's response to stress and fatigue, which may be affected by VDT work, was improved by both tested treatments; however, there were no significant differences between the two groups. When compared with heating pad therapy, cupping increased neck-extension significantly, but there were no other significant differences in C-spine ROM. Four participants in the cupping group reported mild adverse events related to the treatment. Because the participants had concomitant disturbing symptoms along with neck pain that might affect the outcome assessment of this study, the results need to be interpreted carefully. However, the results of this study provide good evidence that cupping may be a helpful, when combined with self-care, non-drug intervention for VDT-worker neck pain.

The methodologically low quality of past clinical trials on cupping has been noted as a big obstacle for conclusive evidence of the effectiveness of cupping therapy. Domains such as allocation concealment, incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting were not appropriately or never reported in most of the studies29). In addition, most of the cupping studies adopted cupping not as a single intervention but in combination with acupuncture or other treatment modalities from which we cannot estimate the specific effect of cupping therapy29). We conducted this study with methodological rigor to eliminate serious bias and compared the effect of cupping for neck pain to heating pad therapy without other co-interventions. Thus, these results suggest the overall effectiveness of cupping itself.

Recent studies on the effectiveness of cupping for neck pain suggest a short-term effect of cupping during or after the treatment30,31). In our study, we evaluated the short-term effect and mid-term effect following treatment as well. Cupping demonstrated immediate effects on neck pain that were maintained for at least 12 hours after treatment, and the therapeutic effects on the pain and function of neck were maintained with comparatively large effect sizes until 1 month after the end of the treatment. Similar results were not demonstrated in the heating pad group.

In this study, we only selected VDT workers with chronic and moderate-to-severe neck pain. In accordance with the wide usage of computers and smartphones in modern society, neck pain related to VDT work has increased sharply and affects everyday life6). Together with modifications of life style and workstations, an appropriate treatment for neck pain is needed to improve work efficiency and public health. Various complementary and alternative (CAM) therapies have been suggested to have immediate or short-term effects on neck pain32), but few studies have evaluated the effect in VDT workers. In this sense, it is meaningful and useful in a modern society to evaluate the problems related to VDT work as we did in this study.

There are several limitations in this study. First, this was an open trial where participants and researchers knew the allocation results during the study. The participants of both groups had comparatively high expectations on the effectiveness of cupping for relieving neck pain. The average expectation score was 7 points out of 10 (high expectation) in both groups (Table 1). Patient expectation concerning the effectiveness of specific interventions affects the health-related outcomes33), so blinding of assigned interventions is a critical factor for avoiding the introduction of serious bias in randomized controlled trials. However, even though a sham cupping device has been developed recently34), it could not be used in this study because that device was validated only for application to low-back lesions, and a sham cupping devise attached by adhesives is easily unmasked by participants according to a previous report31). Due to these factors, we did not adopt a sham or placebo control. As a result, there exists a high risk of bias attributable to the non-blinded nature of this study that should be considered when interpreting the observed favorable results in this study. However, we attempted to maintain rigor in two other important domains including allocation concealment and outcome assessor blinding, which may significantly exaggerate the true effects of intervention when performed poorly35,36). Second, to ensure reproducibility of the study results and to improve the quality of clinical practice, the cupping therapy was standardized appropriately and described in detail. This was a pragmatically designed study in which the methods for cupping were decided within minimal guidelines by the individual practitioner. We allowed freedom for the selection of points and stimulation methods (wet or dry cupping) to reflect the real-world clinical situation. As it is a very difficult to separate individual factors affecting the specific effects of cupping, most clinical research does not adopt strict standardized treatment guidelines for the cupping procedure, including the size of cups, applied areas, volume of drained air, and retention time of cups15,30,31,37). To resolve this problem, two kinds of efforts should be made in the future. First, experimental research needs to be conducted to identify the separate physical properties of cupping and evaluate the degrees of their contributions to the observed effects. The other is the establishment of specific reporting guidelines for cupping trials similar to standards for other CAM treatment modalities, such as the STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA)38).

Given the observed clinical effectiveness of cupping for neck pain, we still need to elucidate possible therapeutic mechanisms. Contrary to evidence that suggests the effectiveness of cupping relates to the various conditions of the clinical trials29), there are a few studies that suggest a basic mechanism. Several studies have suggested that wet cupping can improve chronic inflammation through an immunomodulatory effect39,40). Another study suggested that cupping may induce hematological changes (i.e., lowering serum lipid concentrations)41). More likely possibilities include the activation of diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) triggered by tactile stimulus and negative pressure42) and the recovery of chronic soft tissues injuries resulting from improved local blood circulation31). These two mechanisms may contribute to pain relief and functional improvement in the neck as a specific effect of cupping. These hypotheses should be examined in future studies.

Additionally, there is one additional aspect that needs to be discussed. Environmental factors related to VDT work were observed with every participant, and several factors did not meet the standard guidelines for workstations. Inappropriate postures contribute to musculoskeletal symptoms for office workers2) and office furniture, such as chairs, computer tables, display monitors, keyboards and mice, may affect bad sitting posture. A modification of such work environments and health education for office workers appears necessary to prevent VDT work-related symptoms.

In conclusion, the results of this pragmatic study suggest that 2 weeks of cupping therapy with an exercise program may be effective in reducing pain and improving neck function in VDT workers. Future studies testing the efficacy of cupping and using an appropriate sham device will be helpful in evaluating the specific effects of cupping.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the “Development of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Meridian Standard Health Technology” project of the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (K12010). We especially appreciate to Sun-Mi Choi, who allowed us to conduct this clinical trial as a “Development of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Meridian Standard Health Technology” project.

References
 
2012, Japan Society for Occupational Health
feedback
Top