Journal of Occupational Health
Online ISSN : 1348-9585
Print ISSN : 1341-9145
ISSN-L : 1341-9145
Originals
Organophosphate Urinary Metabolite Levels during Pregnancy, Delivery and Postpartum in Women Living in Agricultural Areas in Thailand
Pornpimol Kongtip Noppanun NankongnabSusan WoskieAkkarat PhamonphonPrapin TharnpoophasiamKitsiluck WilaiwanPunnee Srasom
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2013 Volume 55 Issue 5 Pages 367-375

Details
Abstract

Objective: Prenatal exposure to organophosphate pesticides can lead to developmental neurotoxicity. A longitudinal birth cohort was established to investigate pesticide exposures from different agricultural activities. Maternal urinary organophosphate metabolites were measured at 28 weeks of pregnancy (n=86), delivery (n=67) and 2 months postpartum (n=51). Method: Subjects were interviewed with questionnaires about work, home and behavioral factors potentially associated with pesticide exposures, and spot urine samples were also collected. The urine samples were analyzed for dimethyl phosphate (DMP), diethyl phosphate (DEP), diethyl thiophosphate (DETP) and diethyl dithiophosphate (DEDTP), using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Results: The urinary DMP and dialkyl phosphate (DAP) concentrations at 28 weeks of pregnancy and delivery were not significantly different, but the DMP and DAP concentrations at 28 weeks of pregnancy and DAP concentrations at delivery were significantly different (p<0.05) from those at 2 months postpartum. The factors influencing the urinary DAP concentrations at 28 weeks of pregnancy included insecticide used in the home, living close to agricultural farmland, frequency of agricultural field visits during the first and second trimesters of pregnancies, occupation of subjects, pesticide used and other agricultural activities. Conclusions: The urinary organophosphate metabolites, DMP, DEP, DETP, DEDTP, total DEP and DAPs, at 28 weeks of pregnancy, delivery and 2 months postpartum fluctuated depending on their pesticide exposures both at home and in agricultural fields.

(J Occup Health 2013; 55: 367-375)

Introduction

In Thailand, approximately 40% of the land is used for agriculture, and 38.7% of the total national workforce is employed in the agricultural sector1). The Ministry of Agricultural and Cooperatives reported that Thailand imported approximately 39,634 tons of pesticides in 1997 and that the volume increased to 117,815 tons in 20102). A survey of intelligence level in Thai children found that the average IQ fell steadily over the years 1997 to 2009 from 91 to 88, which was lower than the WHO standard range of 90—1103). The results of the age-appropriate development survey in children under 5 years old conducted by the Department of Health concluded that development of Thai children decreased from 72% in 2004 to 67% in 20073). The survey results suggest that poor environment, education and food contributed to the decreasing IQs.

One large birth cohort of primarily Latina women in an agricultural community in the United States was used to examine the association between organophosphate pesticide exposures during pregnancy and the effects on the neurodevelopment of infants and children. The pregnant woman may have been exposed to occupational pesticides or common household pesticides; however, significant impacts on child neurodevelopment were found4-6). As part of that study, Bradman et al. presented the urinary organophosphate metabolite levels of pregnant women in different periods (13 weeks of gestation, 26 weeks of gestation and 9 days after delivery)7). The level of organophosphate metabolites was increased during pregnancy and higher in the postpartum period.

Due to the neurotoxic vulnerability of the developing fetus, exposure of pregnant women to pesticides is of great concern8). Previous studies have shown that in Thailand, there are many cases of improper management of pesticides, inappropriate or nonexistent use of personal protective equipment, use of higher pesticide concentrations than specified on the product label and high volumes of pesticide use on farms9, 10). The aims of this study were to investigate the levels of exposure during pregnancy and postpartum and to identify the factors that increase the risk of higher levels of exposure among our cohort.

Subjects and Methods

Recruitment of pregnant women

Pregnant women who came for prenatal care at the three hospitals, Amnatchareon Hospital in Amnatchareon Province in the north east, Sawanpracharak Hospital in Nakhonsawan Province in the lower north and Paholpolpayuhasena Hospital in Kanchanaburi Province in the west of Thailand, were recruited during May 2011 to January 2012. To be recruited, the woman had to be in their 7th month of pregnancy, had to be 20-35 years of age, had to not have diabetes or hypertension and had to be planning to give birth and have follow-up infant care at the recruiting hospital. This study was approved by the Committee on Human Rights Related to Human Experimentation, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, and the University of Massachusetts Lowell Institutional Review Board.

Data collection

At the hospital, the women were interviewed by nurses regarding general health, diet, work exposures including agricultural work and use of pesticides at home and work at 28th weeks of pregnancy and 2 months postpartum. Spot urine samples were collected in polyethylene bottles at the 28th week of pregnancy, delivery and 2 months postpartum. The urine specimens were stored at −45°C until analysis.

Analysis of urine samples

The analysis of urinary dialkyl phosphates (DAPs) was modified from Alwis et al.11). Four DAPs were determined: including dimethyl phosphate (DMP) and three diethyl phosphates, diethyl phosphate (DEP), diethyl thiophosphate (DETP), diethyl dithiophosphate (DEDTP).

The urinary DAP analysis method

Two milliliters of urine was placed in a 10-ml screw-cap tube and spiked with 25 µl of the internal standard (dibutyl phosphate, 5 mg/l), acidified with 3 M hydrochloric acid (50 µl) and mixed. SPE cartridges (Bond Elut PPL 500 mg/3 ml, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) were placed on VisiprepTM DL Vacuum Manifolds (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). SPE cartridges were conditioned with acetonitrile (4 ml) followed by 0.1 mol/l HCl (4 ml). The urine sample was loaded onto the SPE cartridge at a flow rate of 0.25 ml/min. The cartridge was dried using nitrogen gas (∼30 psi) for 10 minutes, washed with 0.1 mol/l HCl (1 ml), and then dried again for 5 minutes. Elution was accomplished with acetonitrile (6 ml) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min into a 10-ml screw-cap tube containing potassium carbonate (∼25 mg). The eluate was evaporated to dryness in a Reacti-Therm™ III Heating Module (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with high purity nitrogen for approximately 2 hours. The dried residue was resuspended in 2 ml of acetonitrile. Potassium carbonate (∼25 mg) and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-Pentafluorobenzyl bromide (30 µl) were added to the tube, which was then placed in an oven at 60°C for 4 hours. After heating, the sample tubes were allowed to cool to room temperature. The top layer was carefully transferred using Pasteur pipettes to 10-ml centrifuge tubes without disturbing the sediment at the bottom of the tubes. The solutions were evaporated to dryness in a Reacti-Therm™ III Heating Module (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with nitrogen for 30 minutes. The residue was dissolved with 150 µl of toluene and transferred to an auto-sampler vial for analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). An aliquot (1 µl) of the sample was injected in the splitless mode onto a DB-5MS ([5%-phenyl]-methylpolysiloxane) capillary GC column (30 m, 0.25-mm i.d., 0.25 µm) using the autosampler. The carrier gas used was helium. The injection port and transfer line were set at 250°C and 280°C, respectively. Constant flow mode was used with a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min. The temperature of the GC oven was initially set at 90°C for 1 minute, increased at 4°C/min to 150°C and then increased at 50°C/min to 270°C. The final temperature of 270°C was held for 5 minutes. The MS was operated in electron impact ionization mode at 70 eV, and ions were monitored in the selected ion monitoring mode.

The calibration curves of four dialkyl phosphate (DAP) metabolites were prepared at concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75 and 100 ng/ml. The ranges of urinary DMP, DEP, DETP and DEDTP in field samples were not detectable (ND)-90.9, ND-64.1, ND-96.7 and ND-95.0 ng/ml, respectively. The average recoveries of the DAP analysis method ranged from 93.64 to 99.92% at DAP concentrations of 10 and 75 ng/ml. The between-day assay coefficients of variation were in the range of 0.59 to 6.45%. The quality control urine samples containing the four DAP metabolites (10 and 75 ng/ml) were analyzed together with urine samples. The detection limits of the four DAPs were analyzed according to the methods of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)12). The detection limits of DMP, DEP, DETP and DEDTP in urine were 5.00, 0.034, 0.028 and 0.054 ng/ml. Concentrations were reported in nmol/l, and DEP, DETP and DEDTP were summed as total DEP concentration. Adding DMP to the total DEP resulted in four DAP concentrations. Values below the limit of detection were substituted with zero; the detection limits of DEP, DETP and DEDTP were almost zero13).

All urine samples were analyzed for creatinine by automated clinical chemistry analyzers (Hitachi 917 analyzer SN.0967-09, Japan). The creatinine-adjusted DAP concentration was calculated as nmole/g creatinine. The comparisons of urinary organophosphate metabolite levels used the creatinine-adjusted organophosphate metabolite concentrations due to different quantities of urine excreted in spot urine samples.

Classification of the agricultural worker group

The pregnant women were classified in to three groups: (G1) higher risk agricultural workers referred to pregnant women who visited the farmland on 4-7 days in the first trimester and at least 2-3 days in the second trimester; (G2) moderate/lower risk agricultural workers referred to pregnant women who visited farmland less or had family members in the same house working in a field; and (G3) no agricultural work referred to pregnant women who did not perform work related to an agricultural field.

Data analysis

The descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS (version18; PASW Statistics Base 18, Serial no. 5082368, ID no. 5071846) from SPSS (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Thailand. Since exposures were highly skewed, concentrations were reported as the median, range, and interquartile range (IQR). For comparisons, nonparametric analyses were used including the Mann Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test and all pairwise comparisons (Dwass-Steel-Chritchlow-Fligner).

Results

Demographic characteristics

Urine samples were collected from 86 women at 28 weeks of pregnancy, 67 at delivery and 51 at 2 months postpartum. The eighty-six 28 weeks pregnant women were 26 years old on average (SD 4.2). Eighty-six percent had some education at the secondary school or high school level. Their occupations included agriculturist (27%), housewife (20%) and self-employed (13%). Agriculturists grew rice, corn, vegetables, flowers, etc. In their homes, 62.8% of family members of pregnant women worked in agricultural fields. The planting season differed depending on the types of plants. There was at least one growing season at the farm; the growing seasons differ depending on the types of plants. Only one pregnant women smoked cigarettes; she smoked two cigarettes/week. Five pregnant women reported drinking beer; one drank 2-4 times/week, and four drank less than once a month.

Agricultural activities of women at 28 weeks of pregnancy

The pesticide exposures information collected by the questionnaires at 28 weeks of pregnancy and 2 months postpartum is shown in Table 1. During pregnancy, 62% of pregnant women reported using insecticide in their homes. Of those using insecticides, 72% applied the insecticide in their homes, and the most common brands reported were Bigon (55%), Shieldtox (9%), Aswin (7%), Art and Shell (5%) and 16% were other brands. Forty-five percent of the women reported living near farmlands that were sprayed with pesticides.

Table 1. Agricultural activities of women at 28 weeks of pregnancy and 2 months postpartum
Activities of pregnant women 28 weeks of pregnancy (n=86) 2 months postpartum (n=51)
Number (%) Number (%)
Application of insecticide in your home
  Yes 53 (61.6) 28 (54.9)
  No 33 (38.4) 22 (43.1)
You applied insecticide in your home
  Yes 38 (44.2) 28 (54.9)
  Never 48 (55.8) 22 (43.1)
You live next to farmland where pesticides are sprayed
  Not near farmland 43 (50.0) 24 (47.1)
  Near farmland, don't know if pesticides are sprayed 4 (4.7) 1 (2.0)
  Near farmland where pesticide are sprayed 39 (45.3) 26 (51.0)
How often you visit agricultural fields
  Group 1 Agricultural work (Higher risk) 19 (22.1) 13 (21.7)
  Group 2 Agricultural work (Moderate/low risk) 36 (41.9) 24 (24.5)
  Group 3 No Agricultural work 31 (36.1) 14 (33.2)
Working outside your home
  Yes 41 (47.7) 11 (21.6)
  No 44 (51.2) 39 (76.5)
Your occupation
  Agriculturist 23 (27.1) 9 (17.6)
  Other occupation 62 (72.9) 41 (80.4)
You do farm work related to growing plants
  Never 58 (67.4) 49 (96.1)
  Yes 20 (23.3) 1 (2.0)
You apply chemical fertilizer, manure or compost
  Never 63 (80.8) 46 (90.2)
  Yes 15 (19.2) 4 (7.8)
Applied pesticides
  Never 69 (80.2) 50 (98.0)
  Yes 9 (10.5) None
You apply herbicide to control weeds
  Never 71 (91.0) 48 (94.1)
  Yes 7 (9.0) 1 (2.0)
Hand-pick crops, plants or flowers
  Never 57 (66.3) 49 (96.0)
  Yes 21 (24.4) 1 (2.0)

The pregnant women were classified by the amount of time they reported working in agricultural fields during pregnancy. Group 1 (22%) was presumed to be at higher risk. Group 2 (42%) was presumed to be at moderate to low risk. Group 3 (36%) had no agricultural work performed by the women or family members.

Pregnant women performed several agricultural activities; they grew plants (23.3%), applied chemical fertilizer or manure or compost (19.2%), applied pesticide (10.5%), eliminated weeds (9.0%) and hand-picked crops, or plants or flowers (24.4%).

Agricultural activities of women at 2 months postpartum

At 2 months postpartum, 55% of the women reported using and applying insecticides in their homes. Fifty-one percent reported living near agricultural areas sprayed with pesticides, and 22% worked outside their home. In Thailand, mothers who deliver infants can take a leave from work for 45 days to take care of their infants at home. The postpartum mothers reported fewer agricultural activities: 2% grew plants, 8% applied chemical fertilizer, 2% eliminated weeds, and 2% hand-picked crops, plants or flowers.

Urinary DAP metabolites

The unadjusted and creatinine-adjusted urinary DAP metabolites at the 28th week of pregnancy, delivery and 2 months postpartum show variability in exposures over time by metabolite (Table 2). For the creatinine-adjusted DAP, the creatinine levels in urine were very low in a few subjects during the delivery period, but the creatinine levels went back to the normal range at 2 months postpartum. The detection frequency of DMP decreased slightly from 78% at 28 weeks of pregnancy to 72% at delivery and then to 67% at 2 months postpartum. The DEP metabolites were detected in 67, 72 and 63% of the urine samples at 28 weeks of pregnancy, delivery and 2 months postpartum, respectively.

Table 2. Unadjusted and creatinine-adjusted urinary dialkyl phosphate (DAP) metabolite levels at three time points: 28 weeks of pregnancy, delivery and 2 months postpartum
Detection frequency (%) Unadjusted DAP (nmole/l) Creatinine-adjusted DAP (nmole/g creatinine)
50th percentile Range 50th percentile Range
28 weeks of pregnancy (n=86)
DMP 77.9 37.7 ND-121.5 48.9 ND-450.9
DEP 67.4 14.6 ND-72.0 20.8 ND-325.7
DETP 47.7 ND ND-464.4 ND ND-956.3
DEDTP 44.2 ND ND-476.8 ND ND-1199.5
Total DEP 89.5 45.2 ND-613.2 84.1 ND-1332.9
DAPs 95.4 90.1 ND-688.8 160.9 ND-1783.7
At delivery (n=67)
DMP 71.6 36.4 ND-166.0 50.5 ND-829.8
DEP 71.6 14.4 ND-102.8 18.8 ND-376.0
DETP 52.2 2.4 ND-100.5 6.5 ND-755.8
DEDTP 53.7 2.3 ND-505.4 4.5 ND-2066.2
Total DEP 94.0 64.9 8.1-569.8 87.4 ND-2066.2
DAPs 100.0 108.9 11.0-597.2 190.8 ND-2442.8
2-month postpartum (n=51)
DMP 66.7 38.0 ND-720.3 25.6 ND-637.3
DEP 62.8 17.3 ND-416.2 14.8 ND-743.3
DETP 41.2 ND ND-301.3 ND ND-240.8
DEDTP 49.0 ND ND-510.0 ND ND-1399.2
Total DEP 80.4 46.7 ND-717.4 56.1 ND-1546.4
DAPs 90.2 92.1 ND-805.1 101.8 ND-1546.4

DMPs: dimethyl phosphate. DEP: diethyl phosphate. DETP: diethyl thiophosphate. DEDTP: diethyl dithiophosphate, ND: not detectable.

Significant differences were found for the median creatinine-adjusted DMP at 28 weeks of pregnancy (48.9 nmole/g) vs. 2 months postpartum (25.6 nmole/g; at p=0.011) and the median creatinine-adjusted total DEP at delivery (87.4 nmole/g) vs. 2 months postpartum (56.1 nmole/g; at p=0.027). There were also a significant differences for the median creatinine-adjusted DAPs at 28 weeks of pregnancy (160.9 nmole/g) vs. 2 months postpartum (101.8 nmole/g) and delivery (190.8 nmole/g) vs. 2 months postpartum (101.8 nmole/g; p=0.047 and 0.013, respectively).

Pesticide exposure at their homes

The urinary DMP and DAP concentrations of pregnant women who reported that they lived near agricultural areas sprayed with pesticides were significantly higher urine concentrations than those that did not in analyses with the Kruskal-Wallis test and all pairwise comparisons (Dwass-Steel-Chritchlow-Fligner; p=0.011 and 0.021, respectively; Table 3).

Table 3. Creatinine-adjusted urinary organophosphate metabolites (nmole/g) of women in the 28th week of pregnancy categorized by potential for home exposure to pesticides from nearby farmland
Parameter DMP DEP DETP DEDTP Total DEP DAPs
Do you live next to farmland?
  C1. Not near farmland (n=43) Median (IQR)a 37.6 (NDb-78.1) 16.3 (ND-38.9) ND (ND-38.9) ND (ND-22.7) 70.6 (16.3-148.5) 108.7 (49.1-235.4)
  C2. Near farmland but don't know if pesticides are sprayed (n=4) Median (IQR) 88.5 (55.8-126.9) 39.5 (5.2-67.2) 54.7 (ND-139.1) ND (ND-5.7) 113.4 (33.1-164.8) 201.9 (88.9-291.7)
  C3. Near farmland where pesti cides are sprayed (n=39) Median (IQR) 67.0 (40.3-124.7) 30.9 (9.6-60.3) 15.0 (ND-70.2) 1.5 (ND-34.4) 94.3 (47.2-243.5) 202.1 (94.9-317.8)
  p-value for Kruskal-Wallis test and all pairwise comparisons (Dwass-Steel-Chritchlow-Fligner) 0.006* 0.106 0.629 0.352 0.148 0.026*
C1 vs. C2=0.128 C1 vs. C2=0.631
C1 vs. C3=0.011* C1 vs. C3=0.021*
C2 vs. C3=0.680 C2 vs. C3=0.890

aIQR: interquartile range. bND: not detectable. DMP: dimethyl phosphate. DEP: diethyl phosphate. DETP: diethyl thiophosphate. DEDTP: diethyl dithiophosphate, DAP: dialkyl phosphate. *significant at p<0.05.

Agricultural work risk groups

Regarding the agricultural work groups in the women at 28 weeks of pregnancy, Group 1 (higher risk agricultural workers) had a higher total DEP concentration in their urine compared with Group 2 (moderate/low risk agricultural workers, p=0.043) and Group 3 (no agricultural work, p=0.021) in analyses with the Kruskal-Wallis test and all pairwise comparisons (Dwass-Steel-Chritchlow-Fligner) (Table 4). Women in Group 1 (higher risk agricultural workers) also had concentrations of DAPs higher in their urine compared with Group 2 (moderate/low risk agricultural workers, p=0.033) and Group 3 (no agricultural work, p=0.019) (Table 4).

Table 4. Creatinine-adjusted urinary organophosphate metabolites (DMP, DEP, DETP, DEDTP, Total DEP and DAPs in nmole/g) of 28 weeks of pregnant women from agricultural field visits during the first and second trimester of pregnancy
Parameter DMP DEP DETP DEDTP Total DEP DAPs
How often you visit the farmland?
  Group 1 (G1) Higher risk agricultural worker (n=19) Median (IQR)a 59.3 (36.0-125.9) 21.7 (13.5-63.1) 21.4 (0-138.6) NDb (ND-128.5) 201.7 (60.6-268.1) 292.6 (91.3-346.2)
  Group 2 (G2) Moderate/ lower risk agricultural workers (n=36) Median (IQR) 46.2 (ND-98.4) 20.0 (ND-44.8) ND (ND-67.7) 0.8 (ND-22.7) 87.6 (27.0-167.4) 162.4 (82.6-273.0)
  Group 3 (G3) No agricultural work (n=31) Median (IQR) 48.7 (22.7-98.4) 20.8 (ND-41.5) ND (0-34.9) ND (ND-22.7) 65.6 (17.1-120.0) 126.3 (65.2-198.4)
  p-value for Kruskal-Wallis test and all pairwise comparisons (Dwass-Steel-Chritchlow-Fligner) 0.527 0.245 0.240 0.596 0.027* 0.021*
G1 vs. G2=0.043* G1 vs. G2=0.033*
G1 vs. G3=0.021* G1 vs. G3=0.019*
G2 vs. G3=0.968 G2 vs. G3=0.990

aIQR: interquartile range. bND: not detectable. DMP: dimethyl phosphate. DEP: diethyl phosphate. DETP: diethyl thiophosphate. DEDTP: diethyl dithiophosphate, DAP: dialkyl phosphate. *significant at p<0.05.

Pesticide exposure from agricultural work activities in the 28th week of pregnancy

Those who worked outside their homes had significantly higher urinary total concentrations of DEP and DAPs than those worked at home (Mann-Whitney U test p=0.030 and 0.015, respectively) (Table 5). Pregnant women who reported their occupation as agriculturists had significantly higher urinary DEDTP concentrations than those working in other occupations (Mann-Whitney U test p=0.047). Pregnant women who grew plants, applied chemical fertilizer, applied pesticide, eliminated weeds and picked crops/plants/flowers by hand had significantly higher urinary pesticide metabolites (DEDTP, total DEP or DAPs) than those who did not (p<0.05) (Table 5).

Table 5. Creatinine-adjusted urinary organophosphate metabolites (nmole/g) from agricultural activities among women in the 28th week of pregnancy
Parameter DMP DEP DETP DEDTP Total DEP DAPs
Do you work outside your home?
  No (n=44) Median (IQR)a 49.6 (NDb-96.9) 20.4 (ND-50.5) ND (ND-49.0) ND (ND-15.1) 61.7 (16.1-150.8) 105.7 (54.4-243.1)
  Yes (n=41) Median (IQR) 48.3 (33.9-104.4) 20.8 (ND-46.0) 21.4 (ND-75.8) 2.5 (ND-42.6) 117.5 (51.5-234.1) 195.3 (105.1-323.2)
  p-value 0.519 0.957 0.135 0.068 0.030* 0.015*
What is your occupation?
  Agriculturist (n=22) Median (IQR) 50.5 (26.4-129.8) 23.4 (9.8-60.7) ND (ND-64.0) 15.2 (0-147) 113.9 (31.9-266.1) 281.2 (80.5-351.5)
  Other occupation (n=62) Median (IQR) 49.6 (17.1-97.8) 20.8 (ND-44.2) ND (ND-57.9) ND (ND-15.0) 70.4 (20.6-156.6) 148.0 (68.9-246.7)
  p-value 0.465 0.287 0.956 0.047* 0.196 0.100
During your pregnancy, did you do any of the following agricultural work ···· grow plants?
  Never (n=58) Median (IQR) 49.6 (23.7-98.5) 20.9 (ND-44.2) ND (ND-37.8) ND (ND-16.7) 75.8 (24.1-156.6) 150.0 (75.2-242.6)
  Yes (n=20) Median (IQR) 56.2 (37.0-136.6) 20.8 (2.9-62.8) 10.7 (0-120.6) 18.7 (0-144.7) 183.5 (50.9-270.4) 281.2 (119.0-337.1)
  p-value 0.275 0.519 0.360 0.095 0.078 0.025*
During your pregnancy, did you do any of the following agricultural work ···· apply chemical fertilizer, manure or compost?
  Never (n=63) Median (IQR) 50.2 (22.7-98.7) 20.9 (ND-46.0) ND (ND-43.7) ND (ND-16.6) 81.1 (21.7-156.7) 156.7 (75.1-243.9)
  Yes (n=15) Median (IQR) 59.4 (44.1-135.1) 16.6 (ND-51.6) 16.5 (ND-138.6) 24.5 (0-202.5) 201.7 (57.8-272.0) 292.6 (95.6-367.4)
  p-value 0.184 0.862 0.320 0.043* 0.033* 0.010*
During your pregnancy, did you do any of the following agricultural work ···· apply pesticides?
  Never (n=69) Median (IQR) 50.2 (25.6-98.6) 20.9 (ND-45.5) ND (ND-49.4) ND (ND-16.8) 87.0 (23.3-166.8) 159.1 (9.3-164.4)
  Yes (n=9) Median (IQR) 59.4 (44.9-218.5) 39.4 (6.76-57.3) 21.4 (ND-389.1) 30.6 (12.6-126.7) 201.7 (61.3-467.2) 311.5 (183.9-544.6)
  p-value 0.142 0.460 0.306 0.009* 0.062 0.023*
During your pregnancy, did you do any of the following agricultural work ···· eliminate weeds?
  Never (n=71) Median (IQR) 50.2 (27.2-101.5) 20.9 (ND-46.0) ND (ND-43.7) ND (ND-22.7) 81.1 (24.87-165.3) 159.1 (83.4-278.9)
  Yes (n=7) Median (IQR) 59.4 (47.0-109.9) 39.4 (ND-63.1) 70.2 (ND-138.6) 24.5 (ND-202.5) 206.7 (140.7-374.5) 285.9 (273.6-421.5)
  p-value 0.511 0.677 0.245 0.101 0.034* 0.038*
During your pregnancy, did you do any of the following agricultural work ···· hand-pick crops/plants/flowers?
  Never (n=57) Median (IQR) 48.7 (25.0-98.6) 20.9 (ND-44.5) ND (ND-49.4) ND (ND-20.0) 87.0 (23.3-156.6) 156.7 (78.7-243.0)
  Yes (n=21) Median (IQR) 59.4 (41.0-130.7) 17.9 (6.5-56.8) 20.6 (ND-136.1) 2.5 (ND-89.7) 165.3 (52.5-281.4) 291.1 (88.4-373.6)
  p-value 0.188 0.457 0.225 0.297 0.082 0.019*

aIQR: interquartile range. bND: not detectable. DMP: dimethyl phosphate. DEP: diethyl phosphate. DETP: diethyl thiophosphate. DEDTP: diethyl dithiophosphate. Total DEp=DEP + DETP + DEDTP. DAPs=DMP + Total DEP. *significant at p<0.05.

Pesticide exposure from agricultural work activities at 2 months postpartum

The urinary DETP metabolite concentrations of the women who reported their occupation as agriculturist were significantly higher than those who reported other occupations (Mann-Whitney U test p=0.013) (Table 6). Women who reported agricultural activities at 2 months postpartum had significantly higher DAP concentrations than those that did not (Mann-Whitney U test p=0.027).

Table 6. Creatinine-adjusted urinary organophosphate metabolites (nmole/g) from agricultural activities among women at 2 months postpartum
Parameter DMP DEP DETP DEDTP Total DEP DAPs
Since your baby was born, what is your occupation?
  Agriculturist (n=9) Median (IQR)a 27.9 (NDb-91.9) 4.4 (0-22.6) 24.8 (5.1-62.5) 11.1 (ND-180.7) 64.7 (27.0-247.9) 195.3 (76.4-293.2)
  Other occupation (n=41) Median (IQR) 25.6 (ND-60.8) 15.1 (ND-39.2) ND (ND-22.4) ND (ND-59.3) 31.7 (5.1-103.6) 84.8 (23.0-207.3)
  p-value 0.739 0.413 0.013* 0.311 0.265 0.098
Since your baby was born, did you do any agricultural work?
  No (n=46) Median (IQR) 25.6 (ND-59.1) 15.0 (ND-37.0) ND (ND-24.8) ND (ND-55.4) 37.7 (13.0-102.7) 84.7 (36.9-207.2)
  Yes (n=4) Median (IQR) 49.2 (ND-248.6) 2.2 (ND-103.7) 30.1 (ND-103.0) 90.8 (2.8-185.8) 213.1 (48.8-256.5) 264.7 (204.2-347.3)
  p-value 0.689 0.607 0.381 0.251 0.290 0.027*

aIQR: interquartile range. bND: not detectable. DMP: dimethyl phosphate. DEP: diethyl phosphate. DETP: diethyl thiophosphate. DEDTP: diethyl dithiophosphate. Total DEp=DEP + DETP + DEDTP. DAPs=DMP + Total DEP. *significant at p<0.05.

Discussion

In our cohort, 27% of the women reported their occupation as agriculturist, and more than half of them had family members in the same house who worked in agriculture. These women may help with some of the agricultural activities both at home and in the farm fields. Some of them grew plants for family use and to sell. Some of these women may be exposed to pesticides at home, since they reported using insecticides at their homes and some lived near agricultural fields where pesticides were sprayed.

Regarding creatinine-unadjusted urinary metabolites, the organophosphate metabolites DMP, DEP, DETP, DEDTP, and total DEP and DAPs were not significantly different when comparing women at 28 weeks of pregnancy, delivery and 2 months postpartum. Although the women reduced their agricultural activities after giving birth, the unadjusted-urinary metabolites tended to slightly increase at 2 months postpartum. Bradman et al. also found an upward shift of DAP metabolites after delivery (9 days postpartum) compared with prenatal levels. The urinary total DAP levels in the prenatal period in the current study were similar to those in the study of Bradman et al., but the urinary DAP levels at 2 months postpartum were considerably lower than those in the study of Bradman et al. at 9 days postpartum7). The urinary DMP levels in the current study were much higher than those in the study of Bradman et al.7). This may be because Thai people apply more insecticides to prevent mosquitoes and insects at home. The insecticides used in the home (such as ARS, Shell, Bigon and Shieldtox) contain 0.5% dichlovos together with pyrethroid or carbamate insecticides14). ARS contains 0.2% permethrin or 0.07% Neo-Pynamin. Bigon contains 0.3% tetramethrin or 1% Propoxur. Sheldtox contains 0.1% bioallethrin. Dichlorvos can metabolize to DMP in the body15).

Regarding creatinine-adjusted organophosphate metabolites, the DMP and DAPs metabolite concentrations during the prenatal and delivery periods were similar, but the DAPs were significantly lower at 2 months postpartum. This may be the result of the reduced exposure of postpartum mothers or the physical changes postpartum in the mother's metabolism and efficiency of toxin clearance as well as blood volume and body weight16). The observation of higher exposures during the prenatal period may reflect the report by the women that they continued to go to the fields up to delivery, and since the organophosphate metabolites have a half-life of 15-30 hours, this would show up in urine samples17). A previous study reported median urinary creatinine-adjusted concentrations of DMP, DEP, DETP and DEDTP in small scale farmers of ND, ND, 0.88 µg/g creatinine and ND, respectively10). The current study reported median urinary creatinine-adjusted concentrations of DMP, DEP, DETP and DEDTP in pregnant women of 48.87 nmole/g creatinine, 20.82 nmole/g creatinine, ND and ND; the exposure of pesticides in pregnant women was probably lower than those in the small- scale farmers.

Regarding those working as agriculturists, there were higher concentrations of metabolites in the DEP group (particularly DEDTP and total DEP), for activities related to farming (Table 5). The types of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides reportedly used on the farms of 48.39% subjects and family members included profenofos (3.3%), methyl parathion (6.6%), acephate (3.3%), methomyl (20.0%), etc.

The results of the current study clearly presented that pregnant women were exposed to organophosphate pesticides and that this was dependent on living close to agricultural fields, use of insecticides to prevent mosquitoes and insects at home, use of pesticides in their work as agriculturists, field visits and various agricultural activities. To reduce organophosphate pesticides exposure, pregnant women and postpartum mothers should reduce pesticide exposure to as low as possible to prevent developmental neurotoxicity in their children.

The limitation of this study was that the numbers of urine samples from women at 28 weeks of pregnancy, delivery and 2 months postpartum were low (86, 67 and 51, respectively); some urine samples were lost at Sawanpracharak Hospital in Nakornsawan Province due to terrible flooding in Thailand last year.

Acknowledgment: The project described was supported by Award Number R21HD060520 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health. We would like to thank the nurses, doctors, pediatricians and subjects who participated in this project from the three hospitals, Paholpolphayuhasena, Sawanpracharuk and Amnatcharoen Hospitals in Kanchanaburi, Nakhonsawan and Amnatcharoen Provinces, respectively, for their help and excellent care of the subjects and their infants.

References
 
2013 by the Japan Society for Occupational Health
feedback
Top