Journal of Occupational Health
Online ISSN : 1348-9585
Print ISSN : 1341-9145
ISSN-L : 1341-9145
Pulmonary Function in Jute Dust-Exposed Workers: A Dose-Response Relationship
Jie CHENJiezhi LOUXiaofang GUOChen ZHOU
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1997 Volume 39 Issue 4 Pages 313-318

Details
Abstract

Pulmonary Function in Jute Dust- Exposed Workers: A Dose-Response Relationship: Jie CHEN, et al. Department of Pneumoconiosis, China Medical University School of Preventive Medicine—Pulmonary function tests were carried out on 488 jute-exposed workers in a jute mill and 332 control workers. An industrial hygiene survey was also conducted. Most workers in the mill were exposed to dusts containing less than 6% silica, whereas a few workers were exposed to dusts containing approximately 10-16% silica. The cumulative dose of dust exposure [dust level (mg/m3)× exposure year (yr)] was used as an exposure index to relate pulmonary function injury in jute workers. The results showed that jute workers had lower percentages of predicted pulmonary function than those of control workers. As the cumulative dose of dust exposure increased, average levels of pulmonary function (FVC, FEV1, MMF, V50, V25) in smoking male jute workers and V50, V25 in nonsmoking female jute workers significantly declined, and pulmonary function abnormalities (less than 80% of predicted FEV1 or less than 70% of predicted V50) significantly increased as the cumulative dose of dust exposure increased. Examination of the effects of dust exposure and smoking on pulmonary function injury showed that not smoking but jute dust exposure was a factor associated with the decline in pulmonary function; Moreover, smoking interacted with dust exposure in causing declines in FEV1. Our results demonstrated that there is a dose-response relationship between dust exposure and pulmonary function injury in jute workers. Based on this dose-response relationship and by using the life-table method, an exposure limit for jute dust was proposed as 4 mg/m3.

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© Japan Society for Occupational Health
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top