日本印刷学会論文集
Online ISSN : 2185-1263
Print ISSN : 0040-0874
ISSN-L : 0040-0874
EDTAによる塩化第二鉄液 (腐食液) の疲労測定 (第2報)
主として腐食液中の銅の分離とその定量について
宮気 敏川俣 正一山田 修大庭 幸雄
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

1961 年 4 巻 8 号 p. 80-85

詳細
抄録

The Cu2+ containing in the FeCl3 solution is the worst matter to fatigue the solution and make trouble at the etching.
We determined the density of Cu2+ by means of the complexon titration at pH 8; as a buffer solution-1N NH4OH:NH4Cl, as an indicator-MX (Murexide), as a Standard solution-M/100 EDTA.
To determine only Cu2+ in the conjugated solution of Fe3+:Fe2+:Cu2+ is not easy, and we tried the following procedures to separate the Cu2+ from the solution.
I As seen Table 1 and 2 the results were brought out of the precipitation of Fe(OH)3 with 1N CH3COOH/1N CH3COONa and titration of the separated Cu2+.
II Table 3 and 4 are from the results of ether-extraction of Fe3+ from the hydrochloric acidified sample for the determining Cu2+. And Fig. 1 and 2 are showing the Cu2+ to be absorbed at Fe(OH)3 precipitation in I and II ways, they are according to Freundlich's formula of absorption.
III (1) Table 5, 6 and Fig. 3, 4 are showing the Cu2+ taken out by utlizing a strong basic ion-exchangable resin; after producing the basic complexon, it is absorbed to the resin and separated Cu2+ in difference of HCl acid concentration.
III (2) Table 7 and 8 are also showing the Cu2+ from using the resin: after producing the Fe-EDTA complexon, it is absorbed to the resin for separating Cu2+.
In the long run, on the numerical determination of Cu2+ quantity I is the most simple way among them but apt to be making error, while the others II and III are doing good measurement but a little complicated ways.

著者関連情報
© 社団法人 日本印刷学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top