The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability to remove clinically produced dentin smear-layer and to
investigate the relationship between the ability and the short-term bonding effectiveness, using six commercially
available one-step adhesive systems.
Two types of dentin surface produced using a regular-grit diamond bur or #2000 SiC paper were conditioned
with one out of six adhesive systems, that is, G-Bond Plus (GP), Absolute 2 (AB), Bond Force (BF), BeautiBond (BB),
Hybrid Coat II (HC), or Clearfil S3 Bond (TS) without light-curing, and rinsed with acetone and observed by
scanning electron microscope (SEM). Moreover, the other specimens built up resin composites bonded with one out
of the above six adhesives were subjected to micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) testing. Additionally, the
interfaces were observed by transmission electron microscope (TEM).
According to the SEM and TEM images, AB showed a strong ability to remove the smear-layer, whereas the
other adhesives could not dissolve the smear-layer and the smear-plugs. For GP, the μTBS to the regular-grit
diamond bur ground surface was significantly higher than that to the #2000 surface, whereas the μTBSs to the
#2000 surface were significantly higher than those to the regular-grit diamond bur ground surface for AB and TS.
For BF, BB, and HC, the μTBSs to the regular-grit diamond bur ground surface and the #2000 surface were not
statistically different.
It is concluded that the relationship between the ability to remove the dentin smear-layer and the short-term
bonding effectiveness differs according to the adhesives used.
View full abstract