Relative light intensities in thick foliage, which had generally been believed to be constant through-out the day, showed distinct diurnal change in white clover (
Trifolium repens L.) and perennial ryegrass (
Lolium perenne L.) stands under cloudless conditions in summer at 40°30′S (Brougham 1958). This fact was theoretically elucidated in a previous paper. From Brougham's data, extinction coefficient (
k) in the foliage has been approximately calculated with a formula,
k=
F-1ln (
I0/
I), where
F, I0 and
I indicate leaf area index, intensity of incident light and light intensity within foliage, respectively. The calculated
k changes diurnally and reaches the highest in the white clover stand at a sun elevation of ca. 25°, and in the perennial ryegrass, of ca. 30°, at the said latitude. Such a saddle shape of diurnal
k curves is most striking in summer, a little in autumn (or spring), and not recognized in winter.
Using the calculated
k, hourly gross photosynthesis (
Ph) of the pasture stands at latitude 40°30′ has been calculated by Saeki's formula,
Ph=(b/ka) In [{(1-
m)+
kaI0}/{(1-
m)+
kaI0exp(-
kF)}], where
m is leaf transmissibility, and
a and
b are constants in the light-photosynthesis curve of a leaf. The foliage photosynthesis changes diurnally in larger
F in parallel with increase of light intensity, but in smaller
F it reaches a saturation value at early hour and decreased, though very slightly, by midday. This photosynthetic difference concerning the
F values is remarkable in summer, but little in winter. Provided a diurnally constant value of
k, the midday light-saturation of foliage photosynthesis occurs irrespective of
F and season. These phenomena are explained with the relations of foliage photosynthesis to
k and
F.
Murata remarked with regard to midday photosynthetic depression a difference between early stage (or sparser stand) and later stage (oar denser stand) of paddy field. This difference can be better elucidated with analysis of the relationships between midday photosynthesis and
k, and
F. Our analysis of diurnal pattern of the foliage photosynthesis gives a criticism to Lemon and Musgrave's and Mihara's explanation as to foliage photosynthesis in a closed experimental system.
View full abstract