The status and trend of national designated Wildlife Protection Area were examined by comprehensively analyzing the data of all current 86 plans based on four designation categories.
The correlation between designated areas and the number of species were considerable in birds of “large migration areas type” and in mammals of almost all categories (especially “endangered species habitat type”). For mammals, the correlation was higher in large areas than in small areas. In “large-scale habitat type,” the higher the land form diversity and the proportion of Special Protection Area were, the larger the number of bird species inhabiting it was.
The “large migration areas type” was being designated, with the promotion of registration to the Ramsar Site, as an important wetland, which should be priority target to the valuable tidal flats left from land development. Moreover, the percentage of the designation of Special Protection Area was higher than that of other categories.
The “colonial breeding areas type” was mostly targeted at seabird colonies and was designated as islands, especially uninhabited islands. Future designations are required for breeding areas of bats and marine mammals.
The “endangered species habitat type” was designated as an area that overlaps with natural parks. Moreover, many cases had conservation and breeding projects based on the Act on the Conservation of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora for same target species as Wildlife Protection Area.
The introduction of conservation programs in Wildlife Protection Area and the positive designation of Special Protection Area should be performed using all four categories in collaboration with the regulations and programs of these other laws. Furthermore, necessary areas, such as undesignated candidate sites, should be further designated.
抄録全体を表示