The activities of three carbapenems, imipenem, meropenem, and panipenam, as well as that of tosufloxacin, against 88 strains of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 48 strains of
Staphylococcus aureus and 37 strains of
Enterococcus faecalis were examined. In
P.aeruginosa, the activities of piperacillin, ceftazidime, amikacin, tobramycin, ofloxacin, and carumonam were also evaluated. To compare activities the ratios of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of imipenem to the respective MICs of meropenem, panipenem, and tosufloxacin were calculated. In
P.aeruginosa, meropenem had the lowest MICs among the carbapenems. In
S.aureus as well as
E.faecalis, imipenem had the lowest MICs among the carbapenems. To evaluate the cross-antimicrobial activity between imipenem and the other antimicrobial agents, we introduced a parameter called the MIC ratios distribution index. In
P.aeruginosa, MIC ratios distribution indexes between meropenem and imipenem, panipenem and imipenem, tosufloxacin and imipenem, piperacillin and imipenem, ceftazidime and imipenem, amikacin and imipenem, tobramycin and imipenem, ofloxacin and imipenem, and carumonam and imipenem were 1.01, 0.41, 1.86, 1.47, 1.26, 1.66, 1.82, 1.82, and 1.41, respectively, indicating cross-antimicrobial activity between imipenem and panipenem. In
S.aureus, the MIC ratios distribution indexes between meropenem and imipenem, panipenem and imipenem, and tosufloxacin and imipenem were 0.35, 0.42, and 0.75, respectively, indecating cross-antimicrobial activity between carbapenems. In
E. faecalis, the MIC ratios distribution indexes between meropenem and imipenem, panipenem and imipenem, and tosufloxacin and imipenem were 0.65, 0.19, and 2.57, respectively, indicating crossantimicrobial activity between carbapenems, but no cross-antimicrobial activity between imipenem and tosufloxacin. These results seem helpful in providing useful guidelines for choosing an effective treatment against clinical isolates of
P. aeruginosa, S.aureus, and
E.faecalis.
View full abstract