Epidemiological evidence of increased risks of cancer in heart failure (HF) patients and HF in cancer patients has suggested close relationships between the pathogenesis of both diseases. Indeed, HF and cancer share common risk factors, including aging and unhealthy lifestyles, and underlying mechanisms, including activation of the sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, chronic inflammation, and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Mechanistically, HF accelerates cancer development and progression via secreted factors, so-called cardiokines, and epigenetic remodeling of bone marrow cells into an immunosuppressive phenotype. Reciprocally, cancer promotes HF via cachexia-related wasting and metabolic remodeling in the heart, and possibly via cancer-derived extracellular vesicles influencing myocardial structure and function. The novel concept of the “heart-cancer axis” will help in our understanding of the shared and reciprocal relationships between HF and cancer, and provide innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for both diseases.

Growing evidence has shown a bidirectional link between the cardiologic and oncologic fields. Several investigations support the role of unhealthy behaviors as pathogenic factors of both cardiovascular disease and cancer. We report epidemiological and research findings on the pathophysiological mechanisms linking unhealthy lifestyle to cardiovascular disease and cancer. For each unhealthy behavior, we also discuss the role of preventive measures able to affect both cardiovascular disease and cancer occurrence and progression.

Background:The effect of incidental pulmonary embolism (PE) on long-term prognosis in cancer patients is unclear. This study assessed the characteristics of cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the effect of incidental PE identified by oncologists on long-term survival of patients with cancer.

Methods and Results:This single-center, retrospective, cohort study used hospital-based cancer registry data from the Osaka International Cancer Institute linked with electronic medical records and administrative data from Japan’s Diagnosis Procedure Combination Per-diem Payment System. Overall, 15,689 cancer patients underwent contrast-enhanced thoracic computed tomography during 2010–2018. After excluding patients with missing data, symptomatic patients, or patients with suspected PE, 174 with incidental PE (PE+ group) and 13,197 with no PE (PE− group) were identified. The total incidence of incidental PE was 1.3%. No deaths from thrombotic events were identified in the PE+ group. Both groups were adjusted for cancer- and VTE-related characteristics using inverse probability weighting. After adjusting for immortal time bias in the PE+ group, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that all-cause mortality was higher in the PE+ group (hazard ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.53–3.33). A Cox proportional hazard model revealed that metastatic cancer and a history of curative treatment were significant prognostic factors, whereas central PE and residual proximal deep vein thrombosis were not.

Conclusions:Incidental PE in cancer patients indicates poorer prognosis. Cancer-related but not thrombosis-related factors determine prognosis.

Background: It remains controversial whether a cancer history increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who undergo revascularization.

Methods and Results: Patients who were confirmed as type 1 acute MI (AMI) by coronary angiography were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who died in hospital or those not undergoing revascularization were excluded. Patients with a cancer history were compared with those without it. A cancer history was examined in the in-hospital cancer registry. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, recurrent type 1 MI, post-discharge coronary revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke. Among 551 AMI patients, 55 had a cancer history (cancer group) and 496 did not (non-cancer group). Cox proportional hazards model revealed that the risk of composite endpoint was significantly higher in the cancer group than in the non-cancer group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13–2.82). Among the cancer group, patients who were diagnosed as AMI within 6 months after the cancer diagnosis had a higher risk of the composite endpoint than those who were diagnosed as AMI 6 months or later after the cancer diagnosis (adjusted HR: 5.43; 95% CI: 1.55–19.07).

Conclusions: A cancer history increased the risk of CV events after discharge among AMI patients after revascularization.

Background: Hypertension is a frequent adverse event caused by vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway (VSP) inhibitors. However, the impact of hypertension on clinical outcomes during VSP inhibitor therapy remains controversial.

Methods and Results: We reviewed 3,460 cancer patients treated with VSP inhibitors from the LIFE Study database, comprising Japanese claims data between 2016 and 2020. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the timing of hypertension onset: (1) new-onset hypertension (n=569; hypertension developing after VSP inhibitor administration); (2) pre-existing hypertension (n=1,790); and (3) no hypertension (n=1,101). Time to treatment failure (TTF) was used as the primary endpoint as a surrogate for clinical outcomes. The median (interquartile range) TTF in the new-onset and pre-existing hypertension groups was 301 (133–567) and 170 (72–358) days, respectively, compared with 146 (70–309) days in the non-hypertensive group (P<0.001 among all groups). In an adjusted Cox proportional hazard model, new-onset (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50–0.68; P<0.001) and pre-existing (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73–0.98; P=0.026) hypertension were independent factors for prolonged TTF. The TTF of new-onset hypertension was longer than that of pre-existing hypertension (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.62–0.76; P<0.001).

Conclusions: This study highlighted that new-onset hypertension induced by VSP inhibitors was an independent factor for favorable clinical outcomes. Pre-existing hypertension before VSP inhibitor initiation was also a significant factor.

Background:Heart failure (HF) is one of the potential adverse events of pazopanib treatment for soft tissue sarcoma (STS), but detailed reports of such HF cases are scarce. This study determined the incidence and risk factors of HF following pazopanib treatment for STS at our Institute and the clinical outcomes.

Methods and Results:This study retrospectively analyzed the cases of STS patients treated with pazopanib (n=151) between 2012 and 2020. HF occurred in 6 patients (3.9%) at the median onset of 137 (range 14–468) days after the treatment initiation. When their HF was diagnosed, pazopanib was interrupted in all 6 patients. No patients experienced HF-related death, and HF development was not a significant factor for poor overall survival. The cumulative doses of anthracyclines (>225 mg/m²) before pazopanib initiation (83% vs. 37%, P=0.031), pazopanib initiation at age ≥60 years (83% vs. 35%, P=0.026), and the baseline B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration (≥50 pg/mL) before pazopanib (67% vs. 11%, P=0.002) initiation were predictive factors for post-pazopanib treatment HF.

Conclusions:The study findings highlight the effect of past anthracycline exposure and baseline BNP for pazopanib-associated HF. Although the study patients’ clinical outcomes were generally favorable, periodic monitoring of cardiac function using ultrasonic echocardiography or serum markers is essential to detect events early and begin therapeutic intervention appropriately under a cardiologist’s instructions.

Background:Cancer is a known prognostic factor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but few risk assessments of cancer development after ACS have been established.

Methods and Results:Of the 573 consecutive ACS admissions between January 2015 and March 2018 in Nobeoka City, Japan, 552 were analyzed. Prevalent cancer was defined as a treatment history of cancer, and incident cancer as post-discharge cancer incidence. The primary endpoint was post-discharge cancer incidence, and the secondary endpoint was all-cause death during follow-up. All-cause death occurred in 9 (23.1%) patients with prevalent cancer, and in 17 (3.5%) without cancer. In the multivariable analysis, prevalent cancer was associated with all-cause death. To develop the prediction model for cancer incidence, 21 patients with incident cancer and 492 without cancer were analyzed. We compared the performance of D-dimer with that of the prediction model, which added age (≥65 years), smoking history, and high red blood cell distribution width to albumin ratio (RAR) to D-dimer. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curves of D-dimer and the prediction model were 0.619 (95% confidence interval: 0.512–0.725) and 0.774 (0.676–0.873), respectively. Decision curve analysis showed superior net benefits of the prediction model.

Conclusions:By adding elderly, smoking, and high RAR to D-dimer to the prediction model it became clinically useful for predicting cancer incidence after ACS.

Background:Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal form of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study compares the mortality, incidence of recurrent VTE, and incidence of major bleeding between non-cancer and cancer-associated PE patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Methods and Results:This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study involving 130 consecutive patients (87 with active cancer; 43 without cancer) who received DOAC treatment for PE between January 2016 and December 2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly higher mortality in cancer-associated PE patients than in non-cancer patients (35/87 [40%] vs. 1/43 [2%], P<0.001, log-rank test, HR 18.6 [95% CI: 2.5–136.0]). In contrast, the cumulative incidences of recurrent VTE and major bleeding were comparable between the 2 groups. Among the cancer-associated PE patients, the incidence for the composite outcome of recurrent VTE or major bleeding was significantly higher in patients undergoing chemotherapy than in those not undergoing chemotherapy (9/37 [24%] vs. 2/50 [4%], P=0.004, log-rank test, HR 6.9 [95% CI: 1.5–32.0]).

Conclusions:Although cancer-associated PE patients treated with DOACs showed higher mortality compared with non-cancer patients, presumably because of the presence of cancer, the risk of recurrent VTE or major bleeding was comparable between the 2 groups. Thus, DOAC is an important treatment option for cancer-associated PE, although underlying cancer-related risks (e.g., chemotherapy) remain.

Background:Because anticoagulant drugs for ambulatory patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) are limited to warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in Japan, it is important to assess the outcomes of both drugs.

Methods and Results:We retrospectively assessed the outcomes of CAT patients who were treated with warfarin or edoxaban between 2011 and 2017. The assessment was limited to the duration of anticoagulant administration. CAT patients who did not receive anticoagulation therapy were also compared with the warfarin and edoxaban groups. We enrolled 111 CAT patients treated with warfarin (n=58, mean age 62.6 years, mean time in therapeutic range [TTR] % 61.1) or edoxaban (n=53, mean age 64.6 years). Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurred in 2 warfarin-treated patients, the 2 treatment groups were not significantly different (P=0.18). Bleeding during anticoagulation therapy occurred in 6 warfarin-treated patients (2 with major bleeding) and in 5 edoxaban-treated patients (no major bleeding) (P=1.0). The non-anticoagulation group (n=37) showed a high recurrence rate (P<0.01) compared with the anticoagulant group.

Conclusions:This study showed that warfarin and edoxaban are equally effective in preventing VTE recurrence and bleeding. However, warfarin control in CAT patients presented some difficulties. This study also demonstrated the efficacy of anticoagulant drugs, compared with no anticoagulation, for CAT patients to prevent VTE recurrence.