This paper examines the short essays of Japanese university students in their first and fourth years of study, concentrates on the content, shows the characteristics of essays with low evaluations, and considers why the evaluations do not improve. Three types of logical structure were seen in the essays with low evaluations. ・Missing-the-mark type: The apparent "essay structure" and content do not match. ・Derailed type: The argument deviates from the theme at some point. ・List type: Ideas are randomly listed, and the relationship between the assertions and grounds is unclear. The evaluations of the missing-the-mark types improved in the fourth year, but in some cases, improvements were not seen in the derailed types and list types even in the fourth year, and these essays continued to have the same problems. This was because, while there was consistency of content in the missing-the-mark types, the other two types lacked consistency or were unclear. Awareness of consistency of content leads to improvements, but improvements are difficult when it cannot be judged whether or not the assertions cohere with the grounds or when the content has not been brought together for consistency. The paper states that improvements require guidance based on characteristics.
View full abstract