(1)Das Unterschied und Vermischung des sozialen Rechtes und Freiheitsrechtes. (2)Negative Vorschlag zur freiheitsrechtlichen Wirkung, (1)dis negative wissenschaftichen Theorie (1)Vorschlag, (2)seine Kritik. (2)negative Gesetzurteile(Gesetzgebrauche). (1)Gesetzuteile, (2)seine Kritik. (3)Eigneschaft der freiheitsrechtlichen Wirkung. (1)Vorwort (2)die geschtiche Beobachtung -Heterogen der personlichen Freiheit im traditionellen Leben, nach dem Prinzip juris civilis, die Anschliessung dor staatlichen Einmischung. (3)Eigengeschaft -das Prinzip der kapitalistischen Verbesserung(Aktuualisierung der Lebensfreiheit) -die geschichtliche Rolle dor sozialen Gesetzgebung.

抄録全体を表示

Important Point 1. Negligence Although intentional neglience(faute intentionelle) is discriminated from unintentional negligence(faute non intentionelle) in France, it would hardly be significant to study if this discrimination is applicable under Japanese Civil Law Act. 2. Non-fulfillment of obligation The French law regards liability by medical malpractice as liability arising from non-fulfuillment of obligation. Unlike the Japanese law which usually grasps liability by medical malpractice as that by illegal act, the French view strongly supports my theory. However, the issue of the specific property and why most cases can settled as liability by non-fulillment of obligation in France should be studied. 3. Selection of Patients The U.S.A. and France allow doctors to select patients. Under those circumstances, though the patients who may meet the demand of doctors can obtain treatment, those who do not are forced to visit doctors one after another so that curable diseases of them may not be cured. Especially, doctors are even allowed to select emergency cases in France. This would have caused a serious problem if it weren't for governmental methods of relieving patients, but it appears things go well in that country where the social security system is established. 4. Consent In the course of medical treatment which is commenced based on the existence of a medical contract, the patients' consent is required in employing new drugs or surgical methods, especially strictly in the U.S.A. and France. The fact that patients' consent held great weight in recent judgments in Japan is significant in that such Judgments attach importance to patients' discretion.

抄録全体を表示

1. Die Einleitung 2. Die Grundung des Rettungsystems uber neue Impfgesetz (1)Der Verlauf (2)Die gesetzliche Charakter des Rettungsystems (3)Die Zusammenfassung des Rettungsystems 3. Der Gerichtsgebrauch in Bundesrepublik Deutschland uber den Impfungfall 4. Der Rettungsystem des Gesundheitsschaden von Impfungen in Bundesrepublik Deutschland (A)Die Entschadigung von dem Bundes-Seuchen-gesetz (B)Die Verbesserung des Bundes-Seuchen-gesetz 5. Die Moglichkeit in der Anwendung nach unserem Land 6. Die Stelle im System der offentlichen rechtlichen Entschadigung in der Impfschadensfalle 7. Die Aufgabe der Zukunft

抄録全体を表示

At present, the poor suspects who account for mere than half of all, are dealed as the objects of criminal investigation without assist of counsel in Japan. Criminal investigation stage is the most critical one when the fundamental human rights are liable to be invaded. The point of this thesis is that the Defender System enforced in the United States as a legal assist for the poor class is useful to correct the present situation of Japan. The construction of this thesis is as follows : 1. Summary 2. Background of the Defender System 3. Outline of the Defender System 4. Conclusion

抄録全体を表示

Recently many problems have arisen concerning the destruction of the coastline and these need urgent attention. According to the information given out by the Environment Agency in 1981, only 49.1 percent of the coastline of Japan has been preserved. As to Tokyo Bay, there is very little netural beach remaining. This is because of land reclamation activities under the rapid economic growth policies. For example, the reclamation in Takasago beach, Hyogo Prefecture was started in 1961, and the people were deprived of the use of the beach, famous for its beautiful "white sand and green pine trees". The coastline preservation group in this city first used the word "irihama-ken" (coastal access rights) in Japan. We might say that the deprivation of Japanese coastline gave birth to the concept of "coastal access rights" as the theoretical basis for coastlin preservation. The Nagahama Case was the first legal test of the concept of coastal access rights in the Japanese courts. Nagahama is a twon located in the western part of Ehime Prefecture, with a population of some 13.000 people and opens to the Seto Inland Sea. On May 29, 1978, the Matsuyama District Court ruled against coastal access rights. It seems that the ruling of the court followed the traditional legal view : the free use of the seacoast, one of the natural public properties, was a favour granted to the people by the state. I doubt this decision. I think coastal access rights constitute a part of the property rights under Article 29 of the Constitution of Japan.Most of the lawyere try to adopt the concept of "environmental tights" as the legal basis of coastal access rights. In short, according to their view these rights seem to be a part of the environmental rights. However, the environmental rights have not yet been legally recognized and enforceable in Japan. This is the reason why I do not agree with this view. In Japan, there has been a coastal access rights novement in existence since 1973. The association for the movement-established initially in Takasago city-gained support from various people all over Japan. "The Coastal Access Rights Declaration" was written and adopted on February 21, 1975 for the purpose of advocating the establishment of coastal access rights. Above all, agter the decision of the Nagahama Case, the members of the movement have tried to develop the "public trust" theory.

抄録全体を表示

The paper contatins as follows : I. Introduction II. The Walter v. U.S. case in 1980 III. The Kelly v. U.S. case and Sherswin v. U.S. case IV. Conclusion

抄録全体を表示

The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide contains a preamble and 19 articles. In the preamble of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Genocide, it is noted that "at all periods of histry genocide has inflicted great loss on humanity". Without going back to the dawn of man, it can be seen from a unmber of historical facts that the course of human histry has too often been marked by numerous cases where national, ethnic, racial or religious groups were destroyed. For example, in the period shortly before and during the Second World War, the nezis of Germany used genocide as a weapon against certain groups. The general Assembly affirmed that "genocide was a crime under international law which the civilized world condemend". The draft was considered and revised by General Assembly and approved and proposed for signature and ratification by the Assenbly on 9 December 1948, one day before the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide took effect on 12 January 1951. As of 1 January 1978 the Convention has been ratified or acceded to by 82 States.

抄録全体を表示

Introduction 1 The present problems of immigration in the U.S.A. 2 The urgent problems of immigration between Japan and the U.S.A. Conclusion

抄録全体を表示