Purpose: Radiation myelopathy is late injury to spinal cord and should be avoided by radiation oncologists. We analyzed the spinal cord tolerance for permanent radiation myelopathy among long term survivors of esophageal cancer after denitive radiation therapy.
Subjects and Methods: Between 1971 and 1992, 226 patients with esophageal cancer were treated by radiation therapy alone. Of these, 50 patients who survived more than 2 years after radiation therapy were selected for this study. Subjects were 34 males and 16 females aged 47 to 87 (average=72 years old); 5 patients in Ce, 6 in Iu, 20 in Im, 17 in Ei, 2 in Ea; 36 with Stage I-III disease, 14 with Stage IV according to the gross stage of the Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases. We investigated not only radiation factors such as radiation technique, spinal cord dose (TDF) and field size, but also patient factors such as age, sex, body weight, serum cholesterol level, hemoglobin, blood pressure in relation to radiation myelopathy.
Results: Permanent radiation myelopathy occurred in 4 patients (8.0%) at 12, 24, 36 and 52 months, total spinal cord dose being 70Gy (TDF=115), 69Gy (TDF=130), 71 Gy (TDF=121), 66Gy (TDF=103), respectively. No patients who received less than 60Gy to the spinal cord (TDF=99) developed radiation myelopathy. The risk of myelopathy at each dose level was 0/21 at TDF≤-66 (40Gy), 0/3 at TDF≤82 (50Gy), 0/8 at TDF5≤99 (60Gy), 2/14 at TDF≤115 (70Gy) and 2/4 at TDF≥115 (70Gy). No patients who received a cord dose of TDF<120 developed radiation myelopathy if the cord length irradiated was less than 10cm. Spinal cord doses of the patients who developed radiation myelopathy were larger than the following formula: TDF=-20/3×field length (cm) + 580/3. Spinal cord dose and field size were important factors for radiation myelopathy. In regard to patient factors, only serum cholesterol level lower than 170 mg/dl was a significant factor for myelopathy. However, cholesterol levels of all four patients with myelopathy were within normal limits.
Conclusions: We are not proposing spinal cord dose over 60Gy, but our results provide reassurance to radiation oncologists faced with unavoidable spinal dose of 60Gy for tumor control because of wide tumor extension, kyphosis and deviation of the esophagus which may cause radiation pneumonitis due to off-cord fields. We believe that in the large majority of patients the advantages of 60Gy of tumor and spinal dose outweigh the less frequent disadvantages of myelopathy. Spinal cord dose up to 60Gy was tolerable and minimal tolerance dose (TD5/5) might be over 60Gy using conventional fractionation.
View full abstract