Interventions that involve motor imagery have been shown to be effective for rehabilitation. However, no standard methods have been established for measuring older adults’ capacities for motor imagery. This study compares two simple and easy-to-use methods, which are both conventionally used to measure motor imagery. They are the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Japanese Version (JMIQ-R), which is a subjective questionnaire, usually used with young adults, and the imagery-pointing task based on Fitts’ Law paradigm. Twelve young adults (mean=24.17 years) and 12 older adults (mean=73.67 years) participated in the experiment. In addition to several cognitive and motor abilities, we measured the participants’ JMIQ-R scores and latencies for both executed and imagined pointing. The results revealed no significant differences between the young and older adults in terms of their JMIQ-R scores. For the pointing task, however, there were significant differences in the older adults’ latencies for the executed and imagined conditions, when a target was small (i.e., the more difficult task), although the latencies for both executed and imagined pointing in younger adults were similar for all targets. Moreover, JMIQ-R scores were not found to be correlated with the differences between executed and imagined pointing, which indicates that these two methods may measure different aspects of motor imagery or may be differentially sensitive to declines in motor imagery. These results suggest that the JMIQ-R questionnaire may not sufficiently capture declines in motor imagery within older adults.
View full abstract