In Japan, there have been many cases in which an innocent suspect falsely confesses to a crime under interrogation. False confessions are most typically coerced-compliant in nature. The interrogators question an innocent suspect and often seek to obtain a confession when, despite the lack of evidence, they are confident that the suspect committed the crime. In such a situation, the innocent suspect is under incredibly strong pressure, having been arrested, separated from familiar people, and held under total police control. During questioning, the suspect is often treated unjustly and with contempt, with interrogators refusing to listen to the suspect's accounts of events. Accordingly, the suspect will feel desperately helpless and can lose their sense of perspective just wanting an end to the suffering under the severe interrogation in custody. It should be noted that the prospect of some future punishment as a consequence of a guilty verdict is not sufficient to prevent false confessions. Under such agonizing circumstances, an innocent suspect will not be able to make rational comparisons between their present suffering and some vague future punishment, and will not perceive the possible punishment as something that can become a reality. Thus, the suspect may finally succumb to the pressure to make a false confession. The psychology of false confessions can only be understood from the perspective of the suspect themselves within the turmoil of the criminal interrogation. This study proposes the notion of “psychology of being in turmoil,” and argues that our task we must be to tackle this.
View full abstract