In the first report, the authors discussed the stability of an oil-hydraulic system that included a control valve and passive elements (chambers, restrictions, pipelines etc. ).
In this report, the authors have tried to stabilize an oil-hydraulic system with a control valve at the downstream end and a pressure source at the upstream end.
First, a method for dividing a system into two dynamically independent subsystems was developed by using a large restriction or a big chamber.
Secondly, after dividing the system, an effort was made to stabilize that part of the system including the control valve.
Thirdly, as it is well known that a pipeline system with a valve at the downstream end is unstable, the authors have tried to develop a criterion to prevent the instability of the system by inserting restrictions and chambers theoretically.
The experiment was performed for a poppet type valve. The results are in fair agreement with the theory. Finally the following conclusions were drawn;
(a) A theory was developed for dividing a system into two independent subsystems using a big restriction or a big chamber.
(b) In valve-pipeline system, though they are essentially unstable, they can be made stable by inserting restrictions and chambers between the valve and the pipeline.
(c) When the valve is the spool type, the valve-pipeline system can be stabilized with one restriction and one chamber.
(d) When the valve is the poppet type, two restrictions and two chambers are necessary in order to make the valve-pipeline system stable. In this case, the restriction next to the pipeline should be big, and the chamber next to the valve should be small. The other restriction must have an adequate size as shown by Eqs. (27) and (28).
抄録全体を表示