We ascertained the differences and disparities in critical pathways for pulmonary lobectomy among National Hospital Organization (NHO) facilities. In light of the results and clinical evidences, we devised a “best practice” model of the critical pathway for pulmonary lobectomy.
All NHO facilities nationwide were surveyed and their critical pathways for pulmonary lobectomy were ascertained. Items used to compare the listed content of the critical pathway were overall specifications in the form of eligibility criteria, outcomes of patient, discharge criteria, and duration of hospitalization and perioperative management in the form of preoperative breathing exercises, preoperative hair removal, measures to prevent pulmonary embolism, prophylactic antibiotic administration, epidural anesthesia, ECG monitoring, O2 supplementation, urethral catheterization, chest tube management, ambulation, meals, wound care, bathing/shower, postoperative inhalation therapy, postoperative rehabilitation, and lab test scheduling.
Critical pathways at 36 facilities were available for study. In terms of overall specifications, many facilities did not have clearly defined eligibility criteria or discharge criteria. In terms of perioperative management, some forms of care/management tended to be consistent but differences and disparities among facilities were present. Some facilities also provided medications and treatments that deviated from guideline recommendations. Based on survey results, the most recent guidelines, and Diagnosis Procedure Combination payroll system, a standard and recommendable critical pathway was devised.
Among NHO facilities, the differences and disparities in critical pathways for pulmonary lobectomy were present. Whether or not the “best practice” pathway devised can serve as a true best model must be determined on the basis of aspects like the incidence of variance and patient satisfaction.
View full abstract