We aimed to compare the efficacy and complications of novel bioceramic root canal filling materials and traditional root canal filling materials in complex root canal cases. Ninety complex root canal cases treated between January 2021 and January 2023 were selected and equally allocated into a novel group and a traditional group. Novel bioceramic filling materials were used in the novel group, while traditional filling materials were utilized in the traditional group. The clinical data, imaging observations and complications were observed before treatment and during follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months after operation. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, swelling score, infection rate, and incidence rate of periapical lesions were significantly reduced in both groups after treatment (P<0.001). However, the novel group had significantly lower VAS pain score, swelling score, infection rate, and incidence rate of periapical lesions than those of the traditional group after treatment (P<0.05). The novel group was superior to the traditional group in terms of filling quality, root canal morphology, apical sealing, periapical inflammatory response, bone resorption in periapical lesions, and periapical healing score (P<0.05). The cases of infection, root fracture, root canal reinfection, and dislodgement of filling materials were fewer in the novel group than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). The novel bioceramic root canal filling materials have better efficacy and lower risk of complications.
View full abstract