-
Article type: Cover
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
Cover1-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Index
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
Toc1-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Index
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
Toc2-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
SATORU SHIMAMUNE
Article type: Article
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
90-94
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
TOMOHIRO FUKUMORI
Article type: Article
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
95-108
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
Study objective: The present study used interdependent group-oriented contingencies with elementary school students, in order to examine their effects on the students' adaptive behavior. Design: Multiplebaseline design across behaviors. Setting: A public elementary school. Participants: 9 elementary school students (4 boys, 5 girls). One of the boys was a student with a developmental disability. Intervention: Target behavior 1 was "Do class chores." Target behavior 2 was "Write a composition of 5 or more lines in 10 minutes." Target behavior 3 was "Announce the day's news." Measure: The number of students who responded positively to each target behavior. Results: The percentage of positive responses to each target behavior increased. In addition, the students and their teacher reported favorable impressions of this approach. Conclusion: The use of interdependent group-oriented contingencies was effective for increasing the adaptive behavior of regular students, one of whom was a student with a developmental disability.
View full abstract
-
TAKAYUKI TANNO, TAKAYUKI SAKAGAMI
Article type: Article
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
109-126
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
During the half century since Herrnstein (1961) wrote about the matching law, a molecular-molar controversy has been one of the fundamental problems in behavior analysis. The purpose of the present article is to explore further directions for this controversy through classifying it according to 3 points of view. The first of these concerns the principle of reinforcement. Is it the molecular contiguity between response and reinforcement or the molar correlation between response rate and reinforcement rate that controls behavior? The second concerns levels of analysis. Is it the molecular relation between single responses and single reinforcers or the molar relation between response rate and reinforcement rate that appropriately describes the functional relation between response and reinforcement? The third view concerns behaviorism. Several new post-Skinnerian behaviorisms have been proposed in the last two decades. We classify them as molecular or molar behaviorism according to criteria such as mechanismpragmatism and an efficient-teleological distinction. Which kind of behaviorism will provide more productive behavioral science? We summarize these 3 points of view and propose further directions for the molecular-molar controversy.
View full abstract
-
KYOICHI HIRAOKA
Article type: Article
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
127-130
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
TOMOYUKI WAKAZAWA, MASAHIKO SUGIYAMA
Article type: Article
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
131-143
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
Study objective: The present study examined factors that affect preferences of children with developmental disabilities. Design: Prior to the start of the choice evaluation, a paired-item preference assessment was conducted to identify preferred cards to be included in the choice assessments. During the multiple option, correct responses resulted in praise and access to 5 identical cards from which the participant could choose 1 card. During the single option, correct responses resulted in praise and access to 1 card, identical to those available in the multiple option. During the control option, correct responding resulted in praise only. Sessions were divided into 15 trials. Setting: A room in a private-sector facility. Participants: A 4-year-old with Asperger's disorder and a 6-year-old with Autistic disorder. Independent variable: The number of cards from which to choose. Measure: Task selection. Results: The children almost always chose the single option in Study 1. In Study 2, the number of cards in the multiple option was first increased from 5 to 10, then decreased again to 5, and finally again increased to 10. One of the children chose the multiple option more than the single option in all 3 of these conditions. Conclusion: The increase in the number of cards may have temporarily enhanced the reinforcing effect of the participants' choices.
View full abstract
-
NAOKI YONEYAMA
Article type: Article
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
144-146
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
KEI OGASAHARA
Article type: Article
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
147-149
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
KENJIRO AOYAMA
Article type: Article
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
150-152
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
TSUTOMU KAMIYAMA, FUMIYUKI NORO
Article type: Article
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
153-164
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
Study objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of parent training for teaching toilet skills to 2 young children with autism. Design: Baseline, intervention, and modification of intervention procedures. Setting: The parents implemented the intervention procedures in their home. Participants: 2 children (5 years old) with autism and their parents. Intervention: Functional assessment was used to identify intervention procedures. The procedures were modified so that the parents could use them easily. The parents were trained to implement the procedures with their children. The procedures were changed on the basis of the results from their implementation. Measure: Frequency of correct and incorrect toileting behavior and the percentage of correct toileting behavior. The data were collected by the parents. Results: Both children's correct toileting behavior increased, and their incorrect toileting behavior decreased. One child spontaneously acquired the communication skill expressing the need to use the toilet. Conclusion: The results suggest that training parents to use procedures based on functional assessment and discussions with parents and modifying the procedures on the basis of parents' records were effective in increasing the children's appropriate toilet skills.
View full abstract
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
165-176
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
178-180
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
181-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
182-187
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
187-188
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
189-190
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
190-191
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
192-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
193-198
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
198-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
199-201
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
202-203
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
App1-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
App2-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
App3-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
App4-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Cover
2011Volume 25Issue 2 Pages
Cover2-
Published: February 02, 2011
Released on J-STAGE: June 28, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS