Journal of the Japan Lingual Orthodontic Association
Online ISSN : 1884-5371
Print ISSN : 0917-2564
ISSN-L : 0917-2564
Volume 2001, Issue 12
Displaying 1-5 of 5 articles from this issue
  • Toru INAMI
    2001 Volume 2001 Issue 12 Pages 2-8
    Published: 2001
    Released on J-STAGE: July 22, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    I did research in the 20 Japanese young ladies who were treated by the lingual orthodontics to establish the Japanese Standards.
    Sample and Method: 20 Adult Fremale, Average age: 22Y OM, Angle Class II and Bi-maxillary Protrusion. High angle sever cases. Lingual Appliance by Karz 7th generation. Dr. Gormans Step by step.
    1: STRAIGHT Group 11 Females: Lips are behind or on the Esthetic Line on the post treatment cephalogram. 2: CONVEX Group 9 Females: Lips are in front of the Esthetic Line on the post treatment cephalogram This is a sample of the STRAIGHT Group.
    There are many small SNB and SNB in the Convex type not large SNA. The Convex group had a highly Lower-1 to NB line (mm), and IMPA, and smaller FMIA. The very steep occlusal plane angle of the Convex group would be compensated the antero-posterior disorder.
    1: It's very important to control of the vertical dimensions to avoid retrogressing of the mandibular retraction and long face syndrome and be careful not to open the mandibular plane angle.
    2: In the high-angle case, we have to use the skeletal anchorage such as the mini-implant.
    3: Upper and Lower lips must be behind or on the Esthetic line when the Lingual Treatment is finished.
    4: The goal of treatment of ANB (°): U-1 to NA line (mm): L-1 to NB line (mm) must arrive at 0-6-3, 2-4-4, 4-2-5, 6-0-6
    5: Up-righting of the lower incisors until the interincisal angle is to become 130-136°
    6: Do a training of the mouth circumference muscle to make the beautiful smile.
    Download PDF (3973K)
  • Kenji INUDO
    2001 Volume 2001 Issue 12 Pages 9-15
    Published: 2001
    Released on J-STAGE: July 22, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (2893K)
  • Toshihito SATOH
    2001 Volume 2001 Issue 12 Pages 16-20
    Published: 2001
    Released on J-STAGE: July 22, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    In this paper laboratory procedures of bracket positioning, indirect bonding system and NiTi wire bending machine for lingual bracket systems in my private office with no dental technicians are described.
    Now the treatment result of the labial system is a little better and needs less time to finish than that of the lingual system, because a lingual bracket system is more complex than a labial bracket system. So I think that in order to catch up these points the exact laboratory work is of the essence of attaining good results in a lingual bracket system.
    Download PDF (2631K)
  • Masazumi MIYAKE
    2001 Volume 2001 Issue 12 Pages 21-24
    Published: 2001
    Released on J-STAGE: July 22, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (1826K)
  • Tetsuya YOSHIDA
    2001 Volume 2001 Issue 12 Pages 25-27
    Published: 2001
    Released on J-STAGE: July 22, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    The case was Angle class I malocclusion with crowding and maxillary and mandibular protorusion. A decision was made to extract two upper 1st. bicuspids and two lower 2nd. bicuspids and to use a palatal bar for maxillary anchorege.
    The case and diagnosis was popular in lingual orthodontic treatment of Japanese patients.
    Download PDF (1084K)
feedback
Top