In Study I, Social Avoidance and Distress Scale (SADS) was administered to l82 male undergraduates, and their seat choices when talking with an unacquainted woman and impressions of others who would take different seats during an interaction were examined with a questionnaire. Fewer high anxiety students chose the seat directly opposite to the woman than the low; most chose a seat next to the opposite one. In contrast, the low most often chose the opposite. As for impressions, the high tended to rate the other, a woman, as more tense, and seat directions became more important, as the other chose a closer seat. In Study II, female graduate students interviewed 28 high anxiety male students four times. Half of the interview pairs sat across the corner of a table, while the others sat in the next-to-opposite seat, the seat most favored by the high in the first study. Although the interviewers rated the subjects who sat across the corner as more tense at the beginning than the other seat arrangement, their impressions became progressively more relaxed, and ended up with more relaxed. The corner seats appeared to have beneficial effects for clinical interviews.
View full abstract