Purpose: To evaluate the difference of vulnerability in the preterm period in cases of mothers suffered hemorrhagic shock compared to them in the term period.
Method: Case-control study was attempted. Among the women delivered singleton infant by cesarean section in our perinatal center, cases had massive bleeding more than 2,000 mL during operation between 2011 and 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. The subjects were divided into cases(delivered before 35 weeks of gestation)and controls(delivered after 35 weeks of gestation). Indication of cesarean section, vital signs, amount of blood transfusion were reviewed from medical records. Lowest blood pressure, maximum heart rate, maximum shock index(SI), the minimum hemoglobin concentration, and amount of blood transfusion were compared between two groups.
Result: Out of 6,194 deliveries during study period, number of the cesarean operation was 2,361. Among them, the subjects were 64 cases(1%). 12 cases(19%)and 52 controls were compared. Distribution of variables in cases and controls(median, range)were 2,466(2,010-4,839 mL vs 2,360(2,013-4,320)mL(ns)in amount of bleeding, 1.1(0.7-1.8)vs 1.0(0.7-2) (ns)in maximum shock index, 100(70-145)bpm vs 100(70-140)bpm in maximum heart rate, 90(70-110) mmHg vs 90(60-120) mmHg in systolic blood pressure, 12.5(0-90) min. vs5(0-75) min.(ns)in duration between placental separation and SI>1, 1,093(210-1,900)mL vs 957(320-3,150)mL(ns) in amount of bleeding until SI>1, and 17.5(0-90)min. vs 7.5(0-75)min(p=0.010)in duration between SI>1 and recovery to SI<1, respectively.
Conclusion: No differences between cases and controls were found in amount of bleeding, vital signs, and duration until SI>1. However, after mothers suffered shock vitals, time to recover was significantly longer in cases delivered until 35 weeks of gestation compared to cases did after 35 weeks of gestation.
View full abstract