Seven different capillary membranes were tested for β
2-microglobulin (β
2-MG) removal during hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF, 10L substitution). When asymmetrical membranes, i.e., polysulfone (PS-1.6UW), polyamide (Polyflux 130, Polyflux 160), and polyacrylonitrile (PAN-17DX), were used, a higher β
2-MG reduction rate (73%, 68%, 70%, and 64%, respectively) was obtained during HDF than HD. Cellulose triacetate (FB-170U, FB-170E) with symmetrical structure, on the other hand, yielded an unsatisfactory β
2-MG reduction rate (52% and 45%, respectively), even when used for HDF. When polymethylmethacrylate (BK-1.6U) was used, almost equal reduction rates were obtained by HD and HDF (61% and 62%, respectively). Except for BK-1.6U, the sieving coefficient (SC) for β
2-MG measured during treatment sessions was lower for HDF than HD, and appeared to decrease time-dependently. The decrement of β
2-MG SC was most striking with FB-170U, which may account for the absence of marked improvement in β
2-MG removal during HDF with this membrane. FB-170U hada higher SC for prolactin than asymmetrical membranes, and caused considerable albumin leakage. We therefore conclude that FB-170U is not a good choice for HDF, since massive ultrafiltration causes early deterioration of β
2-MG permeability.
View full abstract