Objective: To evaluate ICU performance under a diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) system, we attempted to clarify the influence of the operating policies of the ICU, such as staffing and the decision-making process, on patient outcome.
Methods: The Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine ICU performance evaluation committee, in cooperation with the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare's “DPC” group (Matsuda research group), collected and analyzed information from an ICU investigation study performed in 2008. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system was used to evaluate the severity and outcome of ICU patients. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was used to compare subgroups. Moreover, when a difference in the average predicted mortality rate among the subgroups was not observed, the observed mortality rates were compared.
Results: The median number of ICU beds was 8/hospital, although there was a large difference among hospitals (from 2 to 67). The length of the ICU stay was shorter at ICUs where a full-time intensivist made decisions regarding ICU discharge, compared with the other ICUs (3.53±3.35 days vs. 4.07±5.47 days,
P<0.001). The SMR of ICUs where a full-time intensivist was present at 20:00 was lower than that of the other ICUs. The observed mortality rate in ICUs where a full-time intensivist was present at 20;00 was higher than that of ICUs where a full-time intensivist was not present (odds ratio: 1.394, confidence interval [CI]: 1.078–1.803; chi-squared, 6.16;
P=0.013). The SMR of ICUs where a full-time intensivist made decisions regarding ventilator use was lower than that of the other ICUs. The observed mortality rate was lower in ICUs where a full-time intensivist made decisions regarding ventilator use than in other ICUs (odds ratio: 0.849, CI: 0.596–1.209; chi-squared, 0.665;
P=0.415). Having a clinical engineer and an intensive care-certified nurse on staff had a positive influence on patient outcome. Whether the presence of a society-certified intensive care specialist or a society-certified ICUs improved patient outcome could not be clarified.
Conclusion: Having a full-time intensivist on staff shortened the length of ICU stay and improved the SMR. Having a certified-nurse and a clinical engineer on staff also improved the SMR.
View full abstract