We report here the successful medical management of subacute cardiac rupture (SCR) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Four female cases, 77.8±9.5 (mean±SD) years of age, presented with AMI. The infarct site was anterior in two cases, and inferior in the other two cases. The infarct-related arteries were recanalized successfully by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PICA) in three cases, but emergency coronary angiography was not performed in the other case. After 18.1±16.1 hours from AMI and 3.2±4.0 hours from admission, SCR appeared as cardiac tamponade. Surgical procedures were rejected and/or not indicated in all four cases. Pericardiocentesis was immediately performed and yielded a pericardial effusion of pure blood. Pericardial drainage was performed, reversing the state of shock in each case, but the amount of pericardial effusion drained was limited to the minimum quantity(20-130m
l) which was required to stabilize their circulation. Percutaneous intrapericardial coagulation factor infusion therapy (PICFIT) was subsequently performed, followed by strict bed rest and blood pressure control. The coagulation factor preparations used were thrombin solution in one case and fibrinogen-thrombin-factor XIII preparation in three cases. Intra-aortic counterpulsation was used in one case and artificial ventilation in two cases. The pericardial drainage tubes were removed at 12.3±5.4 hospital days. These therapeutic strategies resulted in the survival and successful discharge of all four cases. The mean hospital stay was 84 days. On discharge, pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricle was not seen nor was diastolic left ventricular function restricted in any case. Two to four years have passed since discharge, and all four patients are still alive with sufficient quality of life. Their clinical courses after discharge were uneventful and the symptoms and signs suggesting constrictive pericarditis were never seen. The efficacy of three treatment modalities (surgery, PICFIT, and conservative management) are discussed regarding 16 cases of SCR. Of all l6 cases of SCR, 7 were treated by surgery, 4by PICFIT, and 5 by conservative management. Eleven cases (6 by surgery, 4 by PICFIT, 1 by conservative management) survived. The surgery and PICFIT groups had more survivors than the conservative group, and this difference was statistically significant (
P<0.025). Thus, some cases of SCR after AMI may benefit from PICFIT even when surgical procedures are not undertaken.
View full abstract