To avoid the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation with higher airway pressure, we applied noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and position change (postural respiratory therapy, PRT) on 12 patients with severe acute respiratory failure (ARF, PaO
2/F
IO
2<200mmHg), and evaluated retrospectively the patients' prognostic factors in NIPPV combined with PRT.
Patients were administered mask CPAP (3-10cmH
2O) with or without pressure support (2-10cmH
2O)and clinically managed in the right or left anterolateral position, whichever showed a better improvement in the PaO
2/F
IO
2 ratio (P/F) compared to the supine position. They were changed into the prone position for less than 2 hours several times a day as essential treatment for dorsal dependent lung lesions. We continued this method as long as patients 1) showed no respiratory fatigue, 2) remained conscious, cooperative and able to cough safely, and 3) showed pulmonary oxygenation improvement by changing positions.
When we turned patients into an anterolateral or prone position from supine soon after ICU admission, 11 of 12 patients (92%) showed improvement in pulmonary oxygenation, and 8 (67%) no longer met the criteria for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (P/F<200). Six patients successfully recovered in several days with NIPPV combined with PRT (successful group), but the other 6 required intubation and mechanical ventilation (failure group). There were no statistically significant differences between the failure group and successful group on ICU admission with respect to APACHE II score (20.1±5.0 vs 18.0±2.4), risk of hospital death (37.2±16.1 vs 29.6±7.5%), lung injury score (3.3±0.7 vs 2.8±0.6), and lowest P/F (114.0±34.1 vs 135.3±31.1). The duration from onset was significantly longer (3.3±0.8 vs 2.0±0.9 days), the respiratory rate (RR) higher (46.7±6.9 vs 33.8±7.8min
-1), and PaCO
2 and base excess (BE) significantly lower (PaCO
2, 27.0±5.3 vs 32.2±2.1mmHg; BE, -6.9±4.2 vs-2.1±1.6) in the failure group. The patients in the successful group had accelerative P/F recovery (turning point)on the 3.7±1.5 ICU day and their P/F in all positions exceeded 300 within 5.7±1.8 days. All patients in the failure group had signs of progressive systemic inflammation including recurrent high fever, endotoxemia, serum CRP elevation. They were intubated and mechanically ventilated from 2.5 hours to 3 days after ICU admission due to respiratory fatigue, septic shock and drowsiness.
We conclude that patients with acute respiratory failure who are managed with NIPPV combined with PRT have a good prognosis when they (1) are not in severe metabolic acidosis, (2) are in the early stages of acute respiratory failure (within 3 days from onset), (3) show no signs of deteriorating systemic inflammation, and (4) have no severe tachypnea or severe hyperventilation (RR<40min
-1, PaCO
2>30mmHg).
View full abstract