During the past 4 years, we experienced 222 cases of the hypertensive putaminal hemorrhage. A comparative clinical assessment of the surgical group of 146 cases and the non-surgical group of 76 cases has been performed. The stastistical analysis of our cases led to the following conclusions.
1) According to neurological grading of putaminal hemorrhage, the cases of grade I had no necessity of surgery and the outcome in grade V was so poor that there was no indication for surgery. On the other hand, in grade IV, surgical treatment showed a better result of mortality than non-surgical treatment.
2) The surgical procedure had better results in mortality even if in the fulminant cases in which there were an eye signs such as negative oculocephalic reflex at admission.
3) From results of CT findings, the influencing factors of the poor outcome were suggested that the hematoma size was larger than 4 cm, the shift of III ventricle more than 6 mm, and the upper and lower extension of putaminal hematoma more than 4 cm. Especially, the cases associated with ventricle rupture were resulted in the poor outcome.
4) There was no correlation between the mortality and neurological dominancy of cerebral hemisphere, but from the aspect of morbidity, the cases of non-dominant side hemorrhage had better results than those of dominant side hemorrhage in both surgical and non-surgical groups.
5) Generally, there was no advantage of early operation. But the per-acute operation should be carried out in the cases in which consciousness level was taking downhill course within a few hours after onset.
6) No significant differences of the functional recovery of extremities between two groups could be found, because the functional recovery of extremities was satisfactory in the cases with mild hemiparesis. On the other hand, the functional recovery in the cases with severe hemiplegia was a little more favoured in surgical group, comparing to non-surgical group.
View full abstract