This study uses the case of the KAIKOSHA, a fellowship organization for ex-army officers, to explore the participation of postwar generations in organizations for former military personnel, along with the rise of “historical revisionism.” Prior research has indicated the difficulty of “passing on” such organizations to postwar generations. However, organizations like the KAIKOSHA have survived. This study examines how the KAIKOSHA overcame its difficulties, focusing on the rise of “historical revisionism” within the organization and the participation of former members of the Self-Defense Forces (SDF).
The KAIKOSHA, developed as a fellowship organization, was required to “reflect on the army.” However, in the late 1990s, opposition to the “historical self-tormenting view” grew stronger and “historical revisionism” emerged within the organization. Simultaneously, there were fierce debates about the organization’s assets and the future. Despite these conflicts, the organization continued functioning by including former members of the SDF as successors to ensure perpetual dedication to the “EIREI.”
Considering this background, the “politicization” of the association was acceptable not only to the generation that had experienced war and wanted to break down the “historical self-tormenting view” under the influence of “historical revisionism” but also to the former members of the SDF who wanted to support the Ground Self-Defense Force (GSDF) and propose defense policies. The direction of “politicization” was different for each generation but the main goal of becoming a political organization was the same. The politically neutral KAIKOSHA has survived to the present day by accepting the postwar generation and transforming into a political organization.
View full abstract