The aim of this paper is to clarify the use of comparative and superlative adjectives in 16th-century English on the basis of a corpus of 24texts. In this period there are four patterns through which adjectives form comparatives and superlatives. Adjectives belonging to the Pattern A (11.2% of the total) use the inflectional comparison alone (the addition of
-er/-est to their stems). Adjectives belonging to the Pattern B (18.5%) employ inflectional and periphrastic comparisons (the placing of adverbs
more/most before their positives) alternatively. Adjectives belonging to the Pattern C (62.5%) employ the periphrastic comparison alone. The Pattern D (7.8%) is what is usually called double comparison, in which
more and most are used with the inflectional comparative and superlative.
From the 14th century through the 16th century the frequency of the Pattern A decreased gradually, while the Pattern B continued to be used with much the same frequency. Conversely, the frequency of the Pattern C increased by degrees. As for the Pattern D, it appears that in the 16th century it decreased somewhat as compared with the previous century, but in reality it proved to be in much wider use.
抄録全体を表示