Introduction: Echo intensity is an important finding in muscle echography, but echo intensity varies with factors such as gain, sensitivity, and time control.
Methods: When assessing a target muscle, an examiner’s bicep was treated as the control muscle. Dual-screen (target and control muscles) and conventional single-screen (target muscle) methods were used. We examined 10 diseased muscles and 10 normal muscles as target muscles. Three echo beginners rated the target muscle using a visual analog scale (VAS). We also measured intensity differences between target and control muscles using pixel values from a histogram.
Results: Using the dual-screen method, intensity of diseased muscles (189.6 ± 28.0 mm, 20.0 ± 21.2 pixels was found to be significantly higher than that of normal muscles (98.7 ± 42.8 mm,
p = 0.005; –19.8 ± 13.9 pixels,
p = 0.007), according to both VAS and pixel values. Using the single-screen method, no significant difference was observed between diseased muscles (197.7 ± 62.7 mm) and normal muscles (112.7 ± 71.1 mm,
p >0.05), as noted by the VAS. However, diseased muscle intensity based on pixel value (49.8 ± 14.9 pixels), was significantly higher than normal muscle intensity (35.0 ± 12.3 pixels,
p = 0.047).
Conclusion: The present analysis suggests that the dual-screen method may be useful for diagnosing muscle echo intensity.
抄録全体を表示