Objective: With the switch to the Bethesda classification from the so-called Nichibo classification that has been in use up till now for reporting pap smear results, a revision of the Japan Society of Ningen Dock's guidelines concerning judgment of results and aftercare has become necessary. For cervical cancer screening conducted by the gynecology departments of health check-up facilities in the Takeda Hospital Group, we have prepared judgment standards for the newly introduced Bethesda classification and aim to use them as a basis for aftercare in the future.
Methods: We applied the Bethesda classification and the Nichibo class classification to 4,948 persons undergoing cervical cancer screening from the beginning of February to the end of June 2010 at 4 health check-up facilities using the same screening center among the 5 such facilities in the Takeda Hospital Group, and also classified them by age. Based on the Bethesda classification, we assigned judgments and diagnoses for the individual health check-up facilities and made new aftercare charts based on them.
Results: On applying the Bethesda 2001 system to the total of 4,948 persons undergoing cervical cancer screening at the 4 health check-up facilities in the Takeda Hospital Group in the 5-month period, 4,853 people were judged as NILM, which indicates no abnormalities. According to the conventional Nichibo Class classification, 4,914 people came under Class I or II which indicate no abnormalities. Simple calculations show that the number of people with no abnormalities under the Bethesda classification was 61 less than that under the former Nichibo class classification and there was a decrease of 1.23% in such people with respect to the total number of examinees. The major reason for this was thought to be insufficient cell numbers due to the cell collection procedure. Under the Bethesda classification, a reported pap smear result of NILM was considered to be fine, while examinees receiving other diagnoses required aftercare including referral for more detailed screening. We also felt that it was important to provide a simple explanation of the results of screening according to the Bethesda system to examinees.
Conclusion: All judgments other than NILM were D, for which aftercare was necessary. In the future, the Society should establish new guidelines concerning judgment grades under the Bethesda classification corresponding to the grades of A, B, C, D and E for pap smear results under the existing system of classification.
View full abstract