Public Choice Studies
Online ISSN : 1884-6483
Print ISSN : 0286-9624
ISSN-L : 0286-9624
Volume 2009, Issue 52
Displaying 1-11 of 11 articles from this issue
Foreword
Articles
  • Tetsuro Okazaki
    Article type: Articles
    2009 Volume 2009 Issue 52 Pages 6-24
    Published: 2009
    Released on J-STAGE: March 22, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    The standard Median Voter Theorem says that parties announce a moderate policy. But, in the real world, this does not necessarily hold. In some cases, a party announces an extremist policy and wins the election.
    In this paper, we try to explain such cases.In our model, the voters do not know the ability of parties. That is, some parties may be less able. If the less able party wins the election, then the voters' utility is reduced. We assume that each party has his own ideological position. The party, announcing the policy that is distant from his ideological position, needs coordination and so on that are costly. So the less able party hardly announces such a policy.Consequently an extremist policy has signaling effect.
    In this paper, we show that there are the cases where the moderate parties with high ability announce an extremist policy. On the other hand, if each party is an extremist, he announces the moderate policy regardless of his ability. Moreover, we analyze the policies and the welfare in the equilibrium. Some derived results are counterintuitive. For example, if the less able party's ability improves, the policy in the equilibrium goes to more extreme one and has negative effect on voters' welfare.
    Download PDF (452K)
  • A Positive Analysis Using Cross Section Data of Japanese Prefectures
    Hiroki Tanaka
    Article type: Articles
    2009 Volume 2009 Issue 52 Pages 25-36
    Published: July 05, 2009
    Released on J-STAGE: March 22, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    This paper focuses on an optimal provision of public services for child care, considering them as local public goods. According to the fiscal competition theory, policy competition among local governments may not induce an optimal provision of local public goods. On the basis of this theoretical consequence, it examines, using an empirical method, whether or not public services for child care of local governments deviate from a level of optimal provision.
    More specifically, I verify whether or not there exits strategic interaction on public expenses for child care among local governments, by using cross section data of Japanese prefectures and estimating linear reaction functions, based on the welfare competition model adopted by Wildasin (1991). From the positive analysis, it can be seen that there is “strategic complement" in the decisions making of local governments. I therefore point out that public expenses for child care can actually deviate from an optimal level.
    Download PDF (524K)
Note
Workshop Reports
Communications
Book Reviews
Information
feedback
Top