The Japanese Journal of Phlebology
Online ISSN : 2186-5523
Print ISSN : 0915-7395
ISSN-L : 0915-7395
Volume 15, Issue 2
Displaying 1-2 of 2 articles from this issue
  • Satoshi Ota, Norikazu Yamada, Akihiro Tsuji, Ken Ishikura, Masahiro Ot ...
    2004 Volume 15 Issue 2 Pages 89-95
    Published: 2004
    Released on J-STAGE: July 30, 2022
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

    Various venous flow increasing methods are used to reduce venous thromboembolism, but the data about superiority among these methods is lacking. We evaluated the percent increase in peak venous velocity and venous volume after each methods compared with baseline value in using pulse wave doppler ultrasonography. Twenty limbs in 10 healthy volunteers were studied. We evaluated five methods including raising lower limbs, elastic stocking, foot pump, calf pump, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) at popliteal vein and seven methods adding dorsiflexion and plantar flexion at common femoral vein.

    Excepting spontaneous movements, calf pump was most effective for increasing venous flow velocity and volume. Although not spread to common femoral vein, foot pump had a significant effect and NMES had a modest effect in venous velocity at popliteal vein. Further prospective controlled trial is necessary to clarify the relationship between peak venous velocity, volume and clinical outcomes.

    Download PDF (58K)
feedback
Top