[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of venous reflux in the deep venous system, superficial venous system and IPVs, and to examine the pathophysiology of primary varicose veins.
[Patients and Methods] One thousand two hundred sixty four patients (356 men, 908 women, mean age 58±11years) with 1606 limbs with primary varicose veins were examined with duplex scan between 1999 January and 2002 July. 417 limbs (26%) had skin changes and belonged to C4-6 of CEAP classifications.
They were divided into four groups according to reflux of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) and saphenopopuliteal junction (SPJ). Distribution of deep venous reflux and incompetent perforating veins and clinical symptoms and signs were compared among four groups.
[Results] 1205 limbs (75%) had reflux in SFJ (SFJ+). 205 limbs (13%) had reflux in SPJ (SPJ+). 166 limbs (10%) had reflux in SFJ and SPJ (SFJ+SPJ). 30 limbs had no reflux (N). 266 limbs (16%) had deep venous reflux. Limbs with deep vein reflux account for 30% in SFJ+SPJ (p<0.001). IPVs were more prevalent in SFJ+ and SFJ+SPJ than in SPJ+ (p<0.001). Direct IPVs (Dodd’s, Boyd’s, Cockett’s and paratibial IPV) account for 81% of all IPV. Prevalence of deep venous reflux and IPVs (especially Cockett’s IPVs) were higher in subjects of C4-6 than of
C2-3.
[Conclusions] It is important to examine prevalent IPVs effectively as well as the saphenous vein and deep venous system for preoperative duplex scanning of primary varicose veins. There are strong correlations between worsening clinical features and prevalence of venous refluxes in the superficial veins, the deep veins, and IPVs. Venous reflux aggravates venous hemodymanics in the legs with varicose veins. Direct IPVs such as Cocckett’s IPVS is important to treat primary varicose veins.
View full abstract