This article examines how genres are differentiated in thachingyi (great songs), also referred to as Burmese classical songs. In particular, I have focused on the creation techniques of the kyo (string songs) and patpyo (drum songs) genres from the following two perspectives: the creation technique of using already established songs and author Myawadi Mingyi U Sa’s (1766−1853, hereafter referred to as U Sa) role in the differentiation of genres.
Conventional literature has attempted to define genres according to their musical features or based on the origin of their names. The authors of such literature evidently believe that these genres can be clearly distinguished from other genres. This opinion is based on the fact that many of the songs in the same genre use the same melodies, and therefore, they are similar to each other. Moreover, all the publications of song anthologies are segregated based on the songs’ genres, and thus it is assumed that all songs can be categorized into a specific genre.
I have discussed the adequacy of genre divisions with respect to song anthologies, which serves as a background for the perspective that genres have immovable boundaries. By analyzing palm-leaf manuscripts, I have highlighted that the songs were not slotted into any particular genre when they were first composed. It was only in 1870 that the first manuscript, which featured a compilation of song titles, was edited according to the songs’ genres. Following this, all manuscripts and publications related to songs began to be edited comprehensively and compiled according to the songs’ individual genres.
On another front, there exist many similar songs that can form a certain genre. The reason for this is that the creation techniques can lean heavily on already established works.
First, I analyzed the manuscript “Monywe beshop’s old songs.” According to its editor, it might be the oldest manuscript of a song. I used the manuscript that was copied in 1917; however, its year of origin is said to be 1788.
This manuscript contains numerous songs of identical or similar titles. I also noticed that a considerable number of the titles include the word alaik, which means melody. These titles imply that each of these songs was composed using the melody of another song, but with different lyrics; these represent parody songs. I found that the alaik technique was also used in patpyo songs.
However, if the songs were created by using already established songs, the question arises of why different genres appeared. I analyzed this from the viewpoint of the authors.
In “Song titles” (year of origin: 1870), “The purification of maha gita” (year of origin: 1881), and “The prominence songs” (copied year: 1917), U Sa composed the maximum number of patpyo songs but only a few alaik songs, and other authors used his songs as the origin for their alaik songs. U Sa regarded his songs as thanzan or new type songs. Thus, I conclude that U Sa composed the original songs according to the patpyo genre. On the basis of the creation technique, U Sa’s works became “already established songs” for the younger authors. U Sa set a new trend in song creation, and thus, the patpyo song genre was formed.
View full abstract