The purpose of this study was to analyze the shaping ability of Mtwo® nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary instruments (VDW, Germany) in comparison with K3® (SybronEnd, USA) and ProTaper® (Dentsply-Maillefer, Switzerland). Simulated J-shaped and S-shaped canals in resin blocks (n=24, each) were prepared with Mtwo (10/04, 15/05, 20/06, 25/06) and ProTaper (S1, S2, F1, F2) instruments using a single-length technique, and with K3 (25/08, 30/04, 25/04, 25/06) instruments using a crown-down preparation technique (n=8, each). Using image analyzing software, pre -and post-instrumentation images were superimposed and material removal was measured for the outer and the inner sides. In J-shaped canals, measuring levels were set at 1, 2, 3 and 5 mm from the endpoint of preparation. In S-shaped canals, two measuring levels corresponding to the coronal and apical curvatures were set. The time required for canal preparation was also recorded. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni-Dunn test. The results demonstrated that, in both J- and S-shaped canals, Mtwo instruments tended to remove more material from the inner side and less from the outer side compared to ProTaper and K3 instruments. Mtwo instruments were significantly faster than K3 instruments (p<0.05) in preparing S-shaped canals, although the three types of instruments showed no significant differences in the working time for J-shaped canals. These findings suggest that Mtwo instruments have the ability to cut inner canal walls of the apical curvature more efficiently than ProTaper and K3 instruments, which might facilitate efficient preparation of double-curved canals.
View full abstract