Purpose: The influence of the dental tubule content on sealing of the dental tubule remains unknown, and further investigation is awaited. In the present study, a desensitizer was applied to dental tubule openings with the contents of the tooth immediately after extraction to morphologically investigate the sealing effect.
Materials and Methods: Four different types of desensitizer were applied (MS Coat F, GLUMA Desensitizer, SHIELD FORCE PLUS, and FL-BONDⅡ) to third molars extracted in Asahi University Hospital.
・Contact angle and surface tension measurement: The dentin was polished until flat using #1,600 waterproof abrasive paper. Samples were then classified into two groups: one was dried under vacuum at 37℃ for 24 hours (D), and the other was immersed in distilled water (W) with 1μ
l of desensitizer. The contact angle was measured chronologically up to 60 seconds. Surface tension was measured chronologically up to 60 seconds using the hanging drop method with a drop of 1μ
l of desensitizer.
・Electron scanning microscope (SEM) imaging of the dentinal tubules and elemental analysis: The cervical area of the third molar immediately after extraction was segmented to expose the dentinal tubule openings. Samples with desensitizer applied within 30 minutes after extraction (30M) and those immersed in artificial saliva for 4 weeks (4W) were fixed with glutaraldehyde, and sealing of the dentinal tubules was observed morphologically. The Ca/P ratio was calculated using an energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. A significance test (ANOVA, Fisher’s PLSD test, p<0.05) was performed for all the values obtained.
Results:
・Contact angle and surface tension: A significant difference was observed in the contact angle depending on the type of desensitizer. There was also a significant difference between D and W, and the contact angle was larger in W. Contact angles of W with GLUMA Desensitizer and SHIELD FORCE PLUS were small. A significant difference in the surface tension was observed depending on the type of desensitizer. Surface tensions in W with SHIELD FORCE PLUS and FL-BONDⅡ were small.
・SEM findings of the dentinal tubules and Ca/P molar ratio: In 30M, dentinal tubules of GLUMA Desensitizer remained open, and organic-like material was observed in the tubules, but disappeared in 4W. In the dentinal tubules of MS Coat F, microparticles and crystals were observed in 30M, but disappeared in 4W. In the dentinal tubules of SHIELD FORCE PLUS and FL-BONDⅡ, approximately 20μm of resin tag-like material was observed both in 30M and 4W, and dentinal tubules were sealed. Since the size of fillers contained in FL-BONDⅡ is larger than the tubules, some of them blocked the infiltration of resin into the tubules. Considering the Ca/P ratio near the dentinal tubule openings of 4W, there was no significant Ca deposition in all desensitizers.
Conclusion: The desensitizers used in the present study showed poor wettability with wet dentin, suggesting that the infiltration of these desensitizers into the vital dentinal tubules is difficult considering the pulpal pressure. However, dentinal tubules of the samples with SHIELD FORCE PLUS were closed by forming approximately 20-μm resin tag-like materials in both samples immediately after extraction and 4 weeks after extraction.
View full abstract