Disinfection and chemical sterilization of dental instruments have been widely practiced in clinical dentistry. Recently, peracetic acid has received much attention as an alternative disinfectant to glutaraldehyde, which has allergenicity, mutagenicity and strong irritability to skin and mucous membrane. This disinfectant solution is effective for a wide range of microorganisms including bacterial spores, and can be used for powerful disinfection and chemical sterilization in a short time. In addition, there has been no report of peracetic acid having allergic potential, suggesting that the disinfectant is harmless to those who handle it. Since dental instruments are repeatedly disinfected and sterilized, peracetic acid solution should not induce significant changes in the appearance and quality of instruments. However, the corrosion behavior of dental metallic instruments in peracetic acid solution has not been systematically investigated. In the present study, the corrosion resistance of six alloys (carbon steel, two stainless steels, brass, aluminum alloy and tungsten carbide) used for dental metallic instruments was evaluated in peracetic acid solution by an electrochemical method, analysis of released metal ions by ICP emission photometry, and analysis of the corroded alloy surfaces by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and visible-ray spectrocolorimetry, and the corrosion resistance was compared with that in other disinfection solutions and deionized water. The effectiveness of adding a corrosion inhibitor to peracetic acid solution for lowering the corrosion rate of instruments was also examined. The following results were obtained. 1. The corrosiveness of peracetic acid solution to ferrous alloys (carbon steel, stainless steel) was sufficiently low to be used as disinfectant solution for instruments made of these alloys. 2. The corrosiveness of peracetic acid solution to brass and aluminum alloys was significantly higher than that of deionized water and alkaline glutaraldehyde solution with pH buffer agent. Thus, peracetic acid solution can not be used as a disinfectant solution for instruments made of these alloys. 3. The corrosion rate of brass was decreased to 1/100 in peracetic acid solution with 3% Na
2HPO
4 due to the formation of a protective surface film composed of Cu(OH)
2. 4. The corrosion rate of aluminum alloy and tungsten carbide was not significantly decreased by the addition of Na
2HPO
4. 5. The pH of peracetic acid solution was increased from 3.8 to 5.2 by the addition of Na
2HPO
4 (3%) and the effective duration of sterilizing power was reduced from 7 days to 2 days. In conclusion, peracetic acid solution is suitable for disinfecting instruments made of carbon steel and stainless steel. The solution with 3% Na
2HPO
4 can also be employed as a useful disinfectant solution for instruments made of brass, though the effective duration of sterilizing power of the solution is short (2 days) compared with that of the solution without Na
2HPO
4 (7 days).
View full abstract