Purpose: To compare the anti-demineralization effects on dentin of a varnish containing surface reaction-type prereacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler as a multi-ion releasing filler and one containing 1.0% NaF which releases an equivalent amount of fluoride.
Methods: Before the demineralization study, we measured the amounts of fluoride ions released from NaF varnish (1.0 FV; 1.0% NaF+40% silica filler, Shofu, Japan) and PRG varnish (PV; 40% S-PRG filler, Shofu, Japan), and confirmed that those concentrations were equivalent. 5-mm-thick root cylinders were prepared from lower bovine incisors and were cut into halves longitudinally using a diamond-coated wire sectioning machine (Well type 3242). Specimens (n=18) were divided into three groups of six: 1) Control (CONT; no coating), 2) NaF varnish (FV), and 3) PRG varnish (PV). An experimental surface on each specimen was prepared and coated according to group. The specimens were then immersed in 6 ml of deionized water at 37℃ for 3 days, after which the varnish was rubbed off with a cotton swab. Acid-resistant varnish was applied, exposing a 1×3 mm window, then the specimens were immersed in an 8% methylcellulose gel demineralization system (1.5 mmol/l CaCl2, 0.9 mmol/l KH2PO4, 50 mmol/l acetic acid, pH 5.0) at 37℃ for 1 week. Then 300 μm-thick sections were cut from each specimen perpendicular to the experimental surface, and mineral profiles, integrated mineral loss (IML: vol%×μm) and lesion depth (Ld: μm) were obtained by transverse microradiography and dedicated software (TMR 2006 and 2012). Statistical difference of IML and Ld were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell test with α=0.05.
Results: The average mineral profile and surface mineral density of 1.0 FV and PV were 27%. That of the lesion body of PV was 18%. PV showed significantly lower integrated mineral loss (2,523±121) than CONT (3,200±184, ANOVA, Games-Howell’s, p<0.05), however, there was no significant difference between CONT and FV (2,817±149). For Ld, there was no significant difference between the groups. S-PRG filler contained in PRG varnish released several ions providing buffering and anti-demineralization activity. Once those ions had penetrated into the root dentin, the anti-demineralization effect remained.
Conclusion: PRG varnish helps to maintain an anti-demineralization effect under the dentin surface even after the varnish containing S-PRG has been removed.
View full abstract