‘Identity’ has become one of the focal issues in the study of international relations along with the epistemological turn in international relations since the late 1980s, the so-called the Third Debate. There are broadly three perspectives in the study of identity; the first approach is constructivism that focuses on scientific and objectivist approaches in examining identity; the second approach is post-structuralism that emphasises the politics of the border on construction of identity; the third approach is historiography that interprets the construction of national identity from historical context.
The aim of this paper is to re-constitute Japanese foreign policy analysis from the standpoint of national identity by properly combining three perspectives above. With critical reading of constructivism, this paper employs post-structuralist discourse analysis that uncovers politics of the border in constitution of particular identities that have been historically articulated. This paper investigates the emergence of national identity in confronting with the U. S. anti-Japanese immigration law in 1924 as a case study. This is because this case was characterised by the politics of the border in constructing national frontier (i. e. Asia/Anglo-Saxon). Remarkably, numerous discursive practices relied on universal rhetoric, such as Seigi or Kodo [Justice]. It was the articulation of particular national frontier via universal principles (in other words, the politics of the border between justified Asia/injustified Anglo-Saxon)
This paper is composed of six parts. The first part summarises the epistemological debate in the study of international relations theory and history, and introduces three approaches to identity: constructivism, poststructuralism and historiography. The second part compares two theoretical approaches to identity: constructivism and post-structuralism. The third part also considers how post-structuralist's politics of the border and historiography of national identity can be synthesised. The fourth part examines methodological relevance of discourse analysis. The next two parts concern the case of the emergence of national identity in the aftermath of anti-Japanese immigration law. The fifth part explores the role of universality and particularity in articulating national identity. The sixth part investigates the emergence of national identity.

抄録全体を表示

本論文は、都市計画道路事業に伴う街並み景観形成において、まちづくり条例にもとづく建築審査会の経験から、審査の役割りなど街並み形成にとって有益な情報を提供することを目的としている。審査会で指摘され変更されたデザインの一覧表から、屋根形態、前面空地のアメニティ、窓やファサードの開放性に関して比較的変更のあったことがわかる。また大規模な２つの敷地における審査過程が検討された。これらの結果から、いくつかの有益な示唆が得られた。すなわち、街並みの雰囲気を現す近代和風といった分かりやすい言葉、初動期に実施された街並み景観シミュレーションを伴うワークショップ、建築士が決定した直後に審査会を実施すること、施主よりも建築士の意見を尊ぶこと、これらの重要性である。

抄録全体を表示

In the 1970s,planning staffs of Essex County Council established the new principles and methods of designing residential areas. In this paper is to be examined the contents of this design control system. In the first part, we analyze the components and conditions of so-called good design, summarize the five new design principles and then point out the importance of the space filled with sense of place. And in the second part, picking up the South Woodham Ferrers, we study the design principles in detail and analyze the contents and compositions of Design Briefs.

抄録全体を表示