Vital measurements were conducted of 114 ama between the ages of 17 and 49 in Boshu Shirahama of Chiba prefecture, and under the direction of Dr. Shiro Ogawara, the following five quantitative measurements, seven indices and formulae for the lower torso were compiled and detailed statistical observations were made.
1) Measured items:
i) Length of front abdomen ii) Width of rib-arch iii) Pelvis width iv) Maximum width of thighs v) Minimum circumference of abdomen
2) Indices:
i) Lower-torso index I (Width of rib-arch·100/Length of front abdomen)
ii) Lower-torso index II (Pelvis width·100/Length of front abdomen)
iii) Lower-torso index III (Maximum width of thighs·100/Length of front abdomen)
iv) Lower-torso width index A (Pelvis width.100/Width of rib-arch)
v) Lower. tors width index B (Maximum width of thighs·100/Width of rib-arch)
vi) Lower-torso width index C (Maximum width of thighs·100/Pelvis width)
vii) Abdominal circumference index (Length of front abdomen·100/Minimum circumference of abdomen)
3) Lower Torso Formulae:
Each index was classified into five or six groups according to its numerical quantity, and each group was marked from one to six.
The Abdominal Circumference Index was designated as“U”, and the numerical formulae which were obtained as the result of arranging the markings in the order of their derivation: thusly, I II III A B C U, were called Lower Torso Formulae.
4) Only Lower Torso Index II and Lower Torso Width Index C derived from the mean numbers of each index were found to be absolutely equivalent when compared with the results of Dr. Shibata's observations of adult women in general residing in Tokyo.
In all other indices differences were noticed between the mean numbers, and except in the case of Lower Torso Index I, the arria were smaller.
However, when the shapes were fixed under Dr, Ogawara's classification system, the mean number of each index was“3”, resulting in exactly identical shapes.
5) There are remarkable differences in individual Lower Torso Formulae, but the Lower Torso Formulae obtained from the mean numbers of each index is 3333333; therefore, presenting the same as that of Shibata's for adult women in general.
6) In other 'words, absolutely no difference is seen in the Lower Torso Formulae between the ama and adult women in general, but compared to the length of their abdomen, the width of the upper part of the lower torso of the ama is wider than adult women in general and in comparing widths the upper part is better developed compared to the, lower part, while on the other hand, the circumference of the abdomen is bigger compared to the length of the abdomen.
These facts mean that the ama is wider at the upper part of the lower torso and has a bigger abdominal circumference than adult women in general.
抄録全体を表示