In 2022, Fujimoto pointed out issues with Sasaki’s （2000） interpretations of the definition of saṅghabheda （dissension and break among the saṅgha; schism）. In response, Sasaki （2022） replied to these criticisms, merely reiterating his two original arguments.

Argument 1: There are two distinct definitions for saṅghabheda; cakrabheda （dissension and break by/related to breaking Śākyamuni Buddha’s teachings） and karmabheda （dissention and break related to disrupting the saṅgha’s activities）.

Argument 2: The definition of cakrabheda was altered to that of karmabheda during the reign of Emperor Aśoka.

On Argument 1: Sasaki confuses definition and incidents. The Vinaya describes two distinct incidents that resulted in saṅghabheda. One is associated with Devadatta and is referred to as cakrabheda, while the other, known as karmabheda, involves the bhikkhus in Kosambi.

It is essential to note that neither cakrabheda nor karmabheda can be considered the precise definition of saṅghabheda; instead, they represent particular incidents.

On Argument 2: It may be reasonable to argue that definitions can evolve over time. However, it is not the case that two distinct incidents （cakrabheda and karmabheda） transitioned from one into the other as time passed.

『根本説一切有部律』は，「

Stories about grapes are more common in the Vinaya of the Sarvāstivādin than in that of the Theravāda. Edible grapes come from two sources: the European grape hails from the Caucasus, and the American grape from North America. This paper examines the grape-growing areas of ancient India and the surrounding region, considering the use of the Vinayas and confirming the knowledge of the ancient Indians through stories of grapes in the Vinayas.

Grape stories in the Vinayas are neither as detailed nor as numerous as those in ancient Greek and Roman texts. According to the travellers Hyech’o 慧超 （704-787） and Xuanzang 玄奘 （602-664） , grapes were cultivated in Kashmir and Kāpisī. This is also the case with Kauṭilya’s Arthaśāstra. Kauṭilya, Hyech’o and Xuanzang offer the same evidence, although from different periods. The distance a camel or donkey carrying a 100 kg load can travel in a day is 30-40 km. It is not easy to transport fresh grapes to the interior of India, and sssuming that grapes are not grown in the interior of the Indian subcontinent, it is not known where the Vinayas were used.