Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Online ISSN : 1347-5215
Print ISSN : 0918-6158
ISSN-L : 0918-6158
Regular Articles
Control of Constipation in Patients Receiving CHOP or CHOP-Like Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Hiroko HayashiAkio Suzuki Koichi OhataMasashi IshiharaYushi KubotaRyo KobayashiYuhei ShibataHiroshi NakamuraNobuhiko NakamuraJunichi KitagawaHisashi TsurumiMasahito ShimizuYoshinori Itoh
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML

2017 年 40 巻 5 号 p. 698-702

詳細
Abstract

Management of constipation in patients receiving cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) or CHOP-like chemotherapy regimens is important for prevention of paralytic ileus. We reported earlier that the laxative action of magnesium oxide is reversed by the concomitant use of antacids in cancer patients receiving opioid analgesics. Here, we assessed the prevalence of prophylactic laxative medication for the control of constipation in patients receiving CHOP or CHOP-like regimens for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Data obtained from 211 eligible patients were retrospectively analyzed. Almost all patients (99%) received anti-ulcer agents such as proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor antagonists for the prophylaxis of gastric disorders associated with prednisolone. Prophylactic laxatives were prescribed in 86 patients (40.8%), in which magnesium oxide was used most predominantly (88.4%). However, magnesium oxide at doses of ≦2000 mg/d was not effective for prevention of constipation, although the compound totally inhibited the incidence of constipation at doses higher than 2000 mg/d. Therefore, it is important to avoid negative drug interaction between magnesium oxide and antacids in patients receiving CHOP chemotherapy.

Vincristine, a microtubule assembly inhibitor, is a vinca alkaloid-type anticancer drug.1,2) Vincristine-based regimens such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP)±rituximab (R-CHOP), clophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone (CVP)±rituximab (R-CVP) and cyclophosphamide, pirarubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (THP-COP)±rituximab (R-THP-COP) are commonly used for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.36) One of the most common adverse effects of these regimens is neurotoxicity associated with vincristine, which is characterized by the progressive degeneration of motor, sensory, and autonomic nerves. This neurotoxicity is a dose-limiting toxicity for vincristine.7) In their retrospective analysis, Utsu et al.8) demonstrated that a dose reduction in vincristine in patients receiving R-CHOP for diffuse large B cell lymphoma is associated with poor prognosis.8) Therefore, prevention of vincristine-induced neurotoxicity is important to improve outcomes in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Previous studies show that constipation is a reliable indicator for paralytic ileus, one of symptoms of vincristine-induced neurotoxicity.911) Paralytic ileus is a severe form of gastrointestinal toxicity and can lead to death in severe cases.9,12,13) Control of defecation is important to prevent or ameliorate paralytic ileus, since constipation often precedes the occurrence of paralytic ileus.911)

However, the efficacy of routine prophylactic treatment with laxatives for prevention of constipation in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving vincristine-based regimens has yet to be clarified.

In the present study, we retrospectively examined the prevalence of prophylactic treatment with laxatives and the incidence of constipation in patients receiving vincristine-based regimens such as CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy regimens for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics Statement

This study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines for human studies outlined by the ethics committee of the Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine (Institutional Review Board Approval No. 27-33), and notified by the Japanese government. In view of the retrospective nature of the study, the need for informed consent from subjects was not required.

Study Design and Patients

A total of 244 patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma were admitted to Gifu University Hospital and received vincristine-based chemotherapy regimens between January 2012 and March 2015. Of these, we excluded 5 patients who were administered opioid analgesics, an agent that frequently causes constipation on its own, and 28 patients who received total parenteral nutrition, leaving 211 patients as eligible. Data on patient demographics, including comorbidity, clinical, laboratory and treatment data, were obtained from electronic medical records.

In the CHOP regimen, doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), vincristine (1.4 mg/m2, max. 2.0 mg) and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) were injected on day 2; while prednisolone (100 mg/body) was administered from day 2 to 6. For R-CHOP, rituximab (375 mg/m2) was administered on day 1. In the CVP regimen, vincristine (1.4 mg/m2, max. 2.0 mg) and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) were injected on day 2, and prednisolone (100 mg/body) was administered from day 2 to 6. For R-CVP, rituximab (375 mg/m2) was administered on day 1. In the THP-COP regimen, pirarubicin (30 mg/m2), vincristine (1.0 mg/m2, max. 2.0 mg) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) were injected on day 2, and prednisolone (30 mg/m2) was administered from day 2 to 6. For R-THP-COP, rituximab (375 mg/m2) was injected on day 1.

Evaluation of Constipation

Constipation was defined as being stool-free for three consecutive days. The incidence of constipation was evaluated during the 10-d period from the start of chemotherapy.

Data Analysis

Data were analysed using SPSS version 22 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). Parametric variables were analysed using the t-test, and non-parametric variables using the Mann–Whitney U or chi-square test. Multiple comparison of non-parametric data was done using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and individual comparisons were done using Scheffe’s test. p Values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient Demographics

Patient demographics are shown in Table 1. Among the 211 eligible patients, 209 (99%) were administered proton pump inhibitors or histamine H2 receptor antagonists. The most common cancer type was diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n=105, 49.8%), followed by follicular lymphoma (n=42, 19.9%), mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (n=15, 7.1%), peripheral T cell lymphoma (n=11, 5.2%), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=5, 2.4%), adult T cell leukemia-lymphoma (n=5, 2.4%), myelofibrosis (n=4, 1.9%), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (n=3, 1.4%), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (n=3, 1.4%), mantle cell lymphoma (n=2, 0.9%), and other cancer types (n=16, 7.7%). The most common chemotherapy regimen was R-CHOP (n=128, 60.7%), followed by CHOP (n=32, 15.2%), R-THP-COP (n=30, 14.2%), R-CVP (n=12, 5.7%), THP-COP (n=8, 3.8%), and CVP (n=1, 0.5%).

Table 1. Patient Demographics
Gender (male/female)113/98
Age (range)62.50 (16–86)
Height, cm159.8±9.7
Weight, kg55.8±11.2
Body surface, m21.51±0.18
Vincristine dose, mg1.8±0.8
Use of antacid, n (%)209 (99.1)
Use of azole, n (%)193 (91.5)
Premedication of laxative agents, n (%)86 (40.8)
Diagnosis, n (%)
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma105 (49.8)
Follicular lymphoma42 (19.9)
Mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma15 (7.1)
Peripheral T cell lymphoma11 (5.2)
Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma5 (2.4)
Adult T cell leukemia-lymphoma5 (2.4)
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma3 (1.4)
Angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma3 (1.4)
Myelofibrosis4 (1.9)
Mantle cell lymphoma2 (0.9)
Other16 (7.7)
Chemotherapy regimen, n (%)
R-CHOP128 (60.7)
CHOP32 (15.2)
R-THP-COP30 (14.2)
R-CVP12 (5.7)
THP-COP8 (3.8)
CVP1 (0.5)

Eighty-six patients (40.8%) were prescribed laxative treatment for the prophylaxis of constipation (Fig. 1A), of whom 76 (88.4%) received magnesium oxide alone, 3 (3.5%) received sennoside alone, 3 (3.5%) received a combination of magnesium oxide and picosulfate, 2 (2.3%) received picosulfate alone, 1 (1.2%) received a combination of magnesium oxide and sennoside, and 1 (1.2%) received a combination of sennoside and picosulfate (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1. Prevalence of Prophylactic Treatment with Laxatives (A) and Items of Laxatives (B) in Patients Receiving CHOP or CHOP-Like Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Effect of Prophylactic Treatment with Laxatives on the Incidence of Constipation

The incidence of constipation did not significantly differ between patients who did and did not receive prophylactic laxatives (30.2% versus 37.6%, respectively, p=0.269) (Fig. 2A). Moreover, magnesium oxide at doses of <2000 mg/d was not significantly effective for prevention of constipation, although the compound completely inhibited the incidence of constipation at doses of >2000 mg/d (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2. Effect of Prophylactic Treatment with Laxatives (A) and the Effect of Various Doses of Magnesium Oxide (B) on the Incidence of Constipation in Patients Receiving CHOP or CHOP-Like Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Data were statistically compared by chi-square test (A) or Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Scheffe’s test (B).

Comparison of Characteristics between Patients with and without Constipation

We subsequently compared the demographics between patients who showed constipation (n=73) and those without constipation (n=138). As shown in Table 2, there were no significant differences in demographics between the two groups, except for the administration dose of magnesium oxide (1155±338 mg/d versus 1387±575 mg/d, mean±standard deviation, respectively, p=0.028) and the number of patients who received high doses (>1980 mg/d) of magnesium oxide (0% versus 10.1%, p=0.005).

Table 2. Comparison of Characteristics between Patients with and without Constipation after CHOP or CHOP-Like Chemotherapy Treatment
With constipation (N=73)Without constipation (N=138)p Value
Gender (male/female)36/3777/610.369a)
Age, (range)64.5 (16–86)60.7 (19–84)0.066b)
Height, cm159.0±9.1160.2±10.10.973c)
Weight, kg55.2±11.656.2±11.10.561c)
Body surface, m21.50±0.181.51±0.180.578c)
Aspartate transaminase, IU/L30.1±25.133.0±50.10.642c)
Alanine aminotransferase, IU/L27.8±28.729.3±54.60.819c)
Serum creatinine, mg/dL0.74±0.310.71±0.230.425c)
White blood cells, /mL6618.2±7783.76444.4±8190.50.882c)
Hemoglobin, g/dL11.5±2.111.8±2.20.407c)
Blood platelet count, g/dL18.3±9.520.2±8.40.138c)
Vincristine dose, mg1.8±0.31.8±0.30.578a)
Use of antacid, n (%)72 (98.6)137 (99.3)0.645a)
Use of itraconazole, n (%)4 (5.5)15 (10.9)0.694a)
Premedication of laxative agents, n (%)26 (35.6)60 (43.5)0.269a)
Dose of magnesium oxide, mg1155.0±337.71387.3±574.60.028b)
Dose of magnesium oxide, n (%)
<1000 mg13 (17.8)27 (19.6)0.757a)
1000 mg≤>1500 mg1 (1.4)1 (0.7)0.645a)
1500 mg≤>1980 mg10 (13.7)10 (7.2)0.128a)
>1980 mg014 (10.1)0.005a)
Diagnosis, n (%)
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma41 (56.2)66 (47.8)0.824d)
Follicular lymphoma13 (17.8)29 (21.0)
Mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma6 (8.2)9 (6.5)
Peripheral T cell lymphoma2 (2.7)9 (6.5)
Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma2 (2.7)3 (2.2)
Adult T cell leukemia-lymphoma1 (1.4)4 (2.9)
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma1 (1.4)2 (1.4)
Angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma1 (1.4)2 (1.4)
Myelofibrosis04 (2.9)
Mantle cell lymphoma02 (1.4)
Other6 (8.2)8 (5.8)
Chemotherapy regimen, n (%)
R-CHOP40 (54.8)85 (61.6)0.423d)
CHOP12 (16.4)20 (14.5)
R-THP-COP14 (19.2)16 (11.6)
THP-COP1 (1.4)7 (5.1)
R-CVP5 (6.8)7 (5.1)
CVP01 (0.7)

Data are mean (S.D.) unless otherwise specified. a) Chi-square test. b) Mann–Whitney U-test. c) Unpaired t-test. d) Mxn chi-square test.

DISCUSSION

In this study, constipation was observed in 34.6% of patients receiving CHOP for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. This incidence rate was similar to those reported previously,4,1416) in which the incidence of constipation for patients of all lymphoma grades was 38–41% for CHOP/R-CHOP4); 29–30% for R-CHOP, R-CVP, and R-THO-COP14); 43.5% for CHOP15); and 30% for R-CVP.16)

Most of our present patients (91.5%) were treated with azole antifungal agents. Interestingly, previous reports indicate that itraconazole potentiates the neurotoxic effect of vincristine via the inhibition of vincristine metabolism by CYP3A4.17,18) Therefore, the incidence of constipation or paralytic ileus may be influenced by combined treatment with azole antifungal agents such as itraconazole.

In contrast, prophylactic treatment with laxatives was prescribed to only 40.8% of patients receiving CHOP or CHOP-like regimens, among whom 88.4% patients received magnesium oxide alone. This prominent use of magnesium oxide is consistent with the findings of our previous multi-institutional study (619 patients from 35 institutions) of laxative pretreatment for prophylaxis of constipation in cancer patients receiving opioid analgesics, in which magnesium oxide was the most frequently prescribed laxative (86.3%).19)

In the present study, prophylactic treatment with magnesium oxide at doses lower than 2000 mg/d had no significant effect on the incidence of constipation. This is in contrast to the findings of our previous study which showed that magnesium oxide at doses of 1000 mg/d and higher significantly prevented the constipation associated with opioid analgesics.19) This discrepancy might be explained by the co-administration in the present study of magnesium oxide with antacids such as proton pump inhibitors and histamine H2 receptor antagonists, which were prescribed in almost all patients (99.1%); specifically, protons are required for the laxative action of magnesium oxide, as shown by the following two equations:   

(1)
  
(2)

The resulting formation of Mg(HCO3)2 increases osmotic pressure within the intestinal tract.20) A retrospective analysis by Yamasaki et al.21) reported that the effectiveness of magnesium oxide at controlling constipation after colon surgery or total gastric resection was significantly worse in patients taking antacids than in those who were not. We also recently reported that antacids, including proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor antagonists, significantly impair the laxative actions of magnesium oxide at doses lower than 2000 mg/d, but not at 2000 mg/d and higher, in cancer patients receiving opioid analgesics.22) Interestingly, in the present study, magnesium oxide at 2000 mg/d and higher did completely inhibit the incidence of constipation. Taken together, the laxative actions of magnesium oxide at doses lower than 2000 mg/d, but not at 2000 mg/d and higher, may be predominantly dependent on the gastric pH.

Other mechanisms may function at higher doses of magnesium oxide. Previous reports indicate that cholecystokinin and constitutive nitric oxide synthase are involved in the laxative actions of magnesium sulfate.23) Interestingly, Vu et al.24) reported that magnesium sulfate administered in combination with a fatty meal causes diarrhea by elevating levels of postprandial plasma peptide YY and cholecystokinin. Furthermore, Ikarashi et al.25) showed in rats that magnesium concomitantly increases the expression of aquaporin 3 in mucosal epithelial cells at the onset of diarrhea. Therefore, higher doses of magnesium oxide (≧2000 mg/d) may be required to sufficiently control constipation in patients receiving H2 receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors.

It is important to note that high doses of magnesium oxide increase the risk of hypermagnesemia in elderly patients and in those with renal disturbances.26,27) Previous studies indicate that hypermagnesemia onset is dose-dependent.28) It is a rare but severe side effect of magnesium oxide intake, with symptoms such as nausea/vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, and muscle weakness in the early stages; and respiratory depression, arrhythmia, consciousness disturbances, and cardiac arrest in severe cases. Moreover, a case report showed that hypermagnesemia can occur at lower doses (1000 mg/d) of magnesium oxide in women with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.29)

In our present study, there were no significant differences in demographics between patients who presented with and without constipation, except for the administered dose of magnesium oxide, indicating that pretreatment with high doses of magnesium oxide was the only factor that reduced the incidence of constipation associated with CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy.

Several limitations of the present study warrant mention. The study was conducted under a retrospective design at a single medical institution and with a small sample size. In addition, the prophylactic effect of laxative agents other than magnesium oxide could not be sufficiently analyzed. Confirmation of our results therefore requires a large-scale, multi-institutional prospective study.

In conclusion, we reported the incidence and control of constipation in patients receiving CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy regimens for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Antacids such as proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor antagonists were prescribed to almost all patients. Prophylactic treatment with laxatives, consisting predominantly of magnesium oxide alone, had no significant effect on the incidence of constipation, but magnesium oxide doses of 2000 mg/d and higher prevented constipation. To avoid drug interaction between laxatives and antacids, and to avoid hypermagnesemia, other laxative agents with different modes of action should be administered to prevent the constipation associated with vincristine.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES
 
© 2017 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
feedback
Top