Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Mechanism of and Risk Factors for Reoperation After Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
Takashi MurashitaYukikatsu OkadaHiroshi FujiwaraHideo KanemitsuNaoto FukunagaYasunobu KonishiKen NakamuraYoshito SakonTadaaki Koyama
著者情報
キーワード: Mitral valve, Surgery
ジャーナル フリー 早期公開

論文ID: CJ-13-0089

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録
Background: We reviewed our 20-year experience of mitral valve (MV) repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) and analyzed the mechanisms and risk factors of reoperation. Methods and Results: Six hundred and fifty-four patients who underwent MV repair for degenerative MR between 1991 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow-up duration was 7.5±4.9 years. Late echocardiography was obtained at a fixed schedule. Standard procedures for MV repair were resection and suture for posterior prolapse, artificial chordal reconstruction for anterior prolapse and a combination of them for prolapse of both. Ring annuloplasty was performed in most cases. We encountered 2 early and 23 late reoperations. Fifteen (60%) were valve-related failure, 9 (36%) were procedure-related failure and 1 was unknown. Valve-related failure was characterized with recurrence of MR due to new prolapse region and progression of mitral stenosis due to leaflet thickening. For them, reoperation was performed at 7.6 years and 14.3 years after the initial operation, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative left ventricular diastolic diameter and residual regurgitation at discharge as risk factors for reoperation. Conclusions: Valve-related failure occurred late due to slow progression of degenerative disease. Long-term follow-up after surgery is mandatory. Given that progression and severity of MR were identified as risk factors for reoperation, early surgical intervention is desirable for degenerative MR.
著者関連情報
© 2013 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top