Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Diabetes Mellitus and Long-Term Risk for Heart Failure After Coronary Revascularization
Yasuaki TakejiHiroki ShiomiTakeshi MorimotoYutaka FurukawaNatsuhiko EharaYoshihisa NakagawaTakao KatoJunichi TazakiEri Toda KatoHidenori YakuYusuke YoshikawaTomohisa TadaMichiya HanyuKazushige KadotaTatsuhiko KomiyaKenji AndoTakeshi KimuraCREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort Investigators
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML 早期公開
電子付録

論文ID: CJ-19-0980

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Background:The effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) status on the long-term risk for heart failure (HF) in patients undergoing coronary revascularization has not been adequately evaluated.

Methods and Results:In this study, 15,231 patients who underwent coronary revascularization in the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2 were divided into 2 groups according to DM status (DM group: n=5,999; Non-DM group: n=9,232). The DM group was further divided into 2 groups according to insulin treatment (insulin-treated DM [ITDM]: n=1,353; non-insulin-treated DM [NITDM]: n=4,646). The primary outcome measure was HF hospitalization. The cumulative 5-year incidence of HF hospitalization was significantly higher in the DM than non-DM group (11.0% vs. 6.6%, respectively; log-rank P<0.0001), and in the ITDM than NITDM group (14.6% vs. 10.0%, respectively; log-rank P<0.0001). After adjusting for confounders, the increased risk of HF hospitalization with DM relative to non-DM remained significant (hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–1.67, P<0.0001), whereas the risk associated with ITDM relative to NITDM was not significant (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96–1.43, P=0.12).

Conclusions:The adjusted long-term risk for HF hospitalization after coronary revascularization was significantly higher in DM than non-DM patients, regardless of revascularization strategy, but did not differ between ITDM and NITDM patients.

著者関連情報
© 2020 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top