Endocrine Journal
Online ISSN : 1348-4540
Print ISSN : 0918-8959
ISSN-L : 0918-8959

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Effects of estradiol and progesterone on prolactin transcriptional activity in somatolactotrophic cells
Tselmeg MijiddorjHaruhiko KanasakiIndri PurwanaSukhbaatar UnurjargalAki OrideKohji Miyazaki
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー 早期公開

論文ID: EJ12-0093

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録
We examined the effects of sex steroids on prolactin promoter activity in rat somatolactotrophic GH3 cells. Both E2 and P4 were found to inhibit basal prolactin promoter activity, but to potentiate TRH-induced prolactin promoter activity. P4 had a greater inhibitory effect on basal prolactin promoter activity than E2, and P4 also potentiated TRH-induced prolactin promoter more potently than E2. Combined treatment with E2 and P4 further increased TRH-induced prolactin promoter activity. E2 and P4 also both reduced basal serum response element (SRE) promoter activity, and increased TRH-induced SRE promoter activity. Combination treatment with E2 and P4 reduced basal activity of SRE promoter and increased TRH-induced SRE activity more potently than E2 or P4 alone. In contrast, basal cAMP response element (CRE) promoter activity was not influenced by either E2 or P4, although TRH-induced CRE promoter was potentiated by each of these steroids, and was further increased by E2 and P4 combination treatment. Both E2 and P4 increased TRH-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation; however, intracellular cAMP levels was not influenced by E2 or P4. TRH-induced CRE promoter was inhibited by MEK inhibitor and was increased by overexpression of MEKK. This study showed that ERK and SRE transcriptional pathways, but not the cAMP/CRE pathway, may be involved in the suppression of basal prolactin promoter activity, whereas both the ERK/SRE and MAP kinase-mediated CRE pathways appear to be involved in the increased transcriptional efficiency of the prolactin promoter induced by TRH stimulation.
著者関連情報
© The Japan Endocrine Society
feedback
Top