心理学研究
Online ISSN : 1884-1082
Print ISSN : 0021-5236
ISSN-L : 0021-5236

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

一対比較型とリッカート型の心理測定の比較
──信頼性・妥当性・回答のしやすさの観点から──
野々田 聖一岡田 謙介
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー 早期公開

論文ID: 93.20231

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Despite the widespread use of Likert scales for psychological assessments, problems of response biases —such as response style and social desirability biases —have been associated with this format. Questionnaires employing the forced-choice format, of which paired comparison is one of the most popular methods, have been drawing researchers’ attention as an alternative that is resistant to response biases. In the current study, we compared the assessments of the paired comparison and Likert formats in terms of their reliability, validity, and ease in answering questions using two psychological questionnaires. The results revealed that the Likert format was superior in terms of reliability and ease in answering, while the paired-comparison format exhibited better factorial validity. The questionnaire that contained a few reverse items underperformed in the paired-comparison, which requires due attention during scale development.

著者関連情報
© 2022 公益社団法人 日本心理学会
feedback
Top