日本放射線技術学会雑誌
Online ISSN : 1881-4883
Print ISSN : 0369-4305
ISSN-L : 0369-4305
脊髄・脳幹部の拡散強調画像におけるPSIF法,SPLICE法の有用性
打越 将人植田 隆史楫 靖辻 昭夫和田 昭彦今岡 いずみ松尾 導昌丸山 克也岡本 淳滝沢 修
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2001 年 57 巻 6 号 p. 639-644

詳細
抄録
Studies have shown that diffusion MR imaging is a reliable method for the diagnosis of central nervous system diseases, especially acute cerebral infarction. Although echo planar imaging (EPI) is a promising tool for that purpose, it is vulnerable to susceptibility artifacts that are responsible for image distortion or signal loss. Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the usefulness of diffusion MR imaging with PSIF (reversed fast imaging SSFP) and split acquisition of fast-spin-echo signals for diffusion imaging (SPLICE) in the central nervous system (CNS). First, PSIF and SPLICE were applied to the phantoms. Each phantom, including acetone, acetic acid, and water, was analyzed for ADC based on SPLICE and for diffusion related coefficient (DRC) based on PSIF. The ADCs based on SPLICE were 4.36±0.89 * 10^<-3> mm^2/sec, 1.25±0.04 * 10^<-3> mm^2/sec, and 2.35±0.04 * 10^<-3> mm^2/sec, and the DRCs based on PSIF were 0.353±0.25, 0.178±0.07, and 0.273±0.018 for acetone, acetic acid, and water, respectively. These calculated ADCs based on SPLICE were well correlated with known diffusion coefficients, showing a correlation coefficient of 0.995. Second, PSIF and SPLICE were applied to the CNS. The advantage of PSIF and SPLICE was that susceptibility artifacts were reduced in the images of spinal cord and brain stem. PSIF was especially useful for diffusion MR imaging in the spinal cord. The disadvantage of SPLICE was the decreased SN ratio. We conclude that PSIF or SPLICE may be helpful when EPI diffusion MR imaging is insufficient.
著者関連情報
© 2001 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top