日本関節病学会誌
Online ISSN : 1884-9067
Print ISSN : 1883-2873
ISSN-L : 1883-2873
原 著
変形性膝関節症に対する超音波監視下の外側と内側アプローチによる関節内注射の利点と欠点について
戸田 佳孝
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2011 年 30 巻 1 号 p. 43-49

詳細
抄録
Objective: Qvistgaard, et al. and Im, et al. reported the feasibility of guidance using ultrasound (US) for intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) using lateral and medial patellar approaches, respectively. This study was designed to compare the accuracy rates and intensity of pain on injection between the lateral and medial approaches.
Methods: One hundred and sixteen patients with “dry” knee OA received injections using the lateral and medial approaches. Air (1 ml) was injected with simultaneous recording of US signals. Once intra-articular positioning of the needle was considered adequate, HA was injected and lateral radiographs were taken to confirm the accuracy from the air shadow. After each injection, participants reported the highest subjective pain level during injection using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Results: The accuracy rates when using the medial approach (110 out of 116, 94.8%) were significantly higher than those when using the lateral approach (96 out of 116, 82.6%), (P=0.003). However, the mean VAS pain level for injection via the lateral approach (31.2%±21.2%) was significantly lower than that for injection via the medial approach (38.4%±20.6%), (P=0.01).
Conclusions: In the lateral approach, the straight surface of the US probe does not match the curved surface of the thigh and the direction of the needle at the insert site was unclear. In the medial approach, the needle punctured through retinaculum tissue to reach the intra-articular space, and thus the VAS pain level during the injection was higher compared with that of the lateral approach.
著者関連情報
© 2011 日本関節病学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top