It is necessary to select a suitable tumor and a pure strain of animals in order to study "the allergy and immunity against tumor."
Fortunately we could find some pure strains of rats and a ascites tumor of rat (Yoshida sarcoma), being appropriate for the delicate observation on this study.
During the successive transplantation of this tumor in rats we could learn the facts that the various attitude to Yoshida sarcoma among strains of rats, namely death of tumor (Yamashita strain etc.) and natural healing (Wistar strain etc.), is almost due to the genetical difference of strains between animal from which Yoshida sarcoma generated and animal in which this tumor was transplanted. The natural healing, followed by the vacuolar degeneration of tumor cells accompaning with the cell reaction and the fibrin exudation in abdominal cavity, occurs spontaneously after 8-12 days during proliferation of tumor cells, and it bases upon the interaction between immune body developed in animals against tumor cells during their growth and tumor cells as a antigen. When the proliferative activity of cells is weak and the development of immune body is strong, the natural healing occurs suddenly, while in inverse condition the animals die of tumor leaving no immunity. Therefore the correlative condition between proliferativity of tumor cells and the development of immune body exerts an important influence upon the death of tumor and the natural healing.
The animals healed naturally from tumor inhibit the retransplantation of the same tumor in a long time (about 100 days), normal rat which were formerly inoculated with the sera of healed rats inhibit the transplantation of this tumor in a certain grade. This serum injured the sarcoma cells in a form of vacuolar degeneration in vitro, it agglutinated the tumor cells and it acted upon protein of tumor cells in the precipitin reaction and the complement fixation test. But the sera of rats died of tumor showed no activity in vitro, and even when these animals were immunized by means of intracutaneous transplanting and extraction by terns they showed no serum reaction, in spite of proving a certain resistance against retransplantation in these animals in a certain period.
The sera of rabbit and goat immunized against Yoshida sarcoma showed a strong cytotoxic effect not only upon Yoshida sarcoma but also upon rats tissues (species specific immunity).
When the sera were absorbed with erythrocytes of rat, there remained still more agglutinin against nucleated cell of rat and Yoshida sarcoma, just like as the sera of Wistar rat healed from Yoshida sarcoma. Being absorbed with emulsion of nucleated cells of rat or of killed Yoshida sarcoma, the sera showed no serum reaction against rat or tumor cells in vitro, but they had still injurious action upon Yoshida sarcoma in a certain grade in vitro and in vivo, just like as the immune sera of Yamashita rat against Yoshida sarcoma.
When these immunized sera were absorbed sufficiently with raw Yoshida sarcoma, they showed no action not only upon rat but also upon tumor cells.
Wistar rat immunized against normal tissues of Yamashita rat inhibit the transplantation of Yoshida sarcoma in a certain period and its serum showed a "taken" in the agglutination test against normal cells of Yamashita rat and also against Yoshida sarcoma in a slight grade. But when the sera were absorbed with normal cells of Yamashita strain it showed no action on both these normal and pathological cells in vitro or in vivo.
Conclusively it is to say that the immunity against Yoshida sarcoma is partially depend upon the normal strain specificity between transplanted (immunized) rat strain and the strain from which Yoshida sarcoma generated. But there exists in sera still more an unkown factor which acts specifically upon Yoshida sarcoma.
View full abstract