It was in February 1897 that the Lumière Cinematograph, imported by Inabata, and the Vitascope, imported by Araki, were first introduced to Japanese audiences in Osaka. In March, another Vitascope was introduced in Tokyo by Arai & Co. and another Lumière Cinematograph in Yokohama by Yoshizawa & Co. But some controversy still surrounds the Yoshizawa’s introduction of the Cinematograph.
The confusion is due to the fact the route by which the projector was acquired is not clear in Yoshizawa’s case. For that reason, some have proposed that Yoshizawa’s Cinematograph was in fact leased from Inabata, and others have suggested the possibility that it was not an authentic Lumière Cinematograph.
However, manuscripts of the letters from Inabata to the Lumières were recently discovered. They proved that Inabata never supported the screenings of Yoshizawa, adding weight to the theory that the projector in question was not the Lumière Cinematograph.
This paper presents a hypothesis on the real identity of Yoshizawa’s Cinematograph. The author’s main point of focus is on the publication catalogue issued by Yoshizawa in 1900, which shows projectors manufactured by Yoshizawa. There is a testimony from Kenichi Kawaura, the owner of Yoshizawa & Co., stating that in the development of the domestic projector, “we used Lumière and Edison models as references.” This paper explores the possibility that one of them on the catalogue imitated an imported projector and that its original was the projector Yoshizawa presented as the “Lumière Cinematograph.”
View full abstract